SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Presstek -- Stock of the Decade??
An SI Board Since March 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
11098 20 0 PRST
Emcee:  SI (no user) Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
10523 Richard, I do feel for you. It's stories like yours I have heard, much toNEIL MACK-2/19/1999
10522 Dear Richard, Don't look back. You are free. Buy another stock you like James C. Shircliff-2/18/1999
10521 I've held on a long time - through the split and the long decline - boughtscrooge-2/18/1999
10520 <Stock is down only 6% though from yesterday's close, so it seems that tBrent-2/18/1999
10519 <i>They said revenues would start growing again, they didn't say Olu Emuleomo-2/18/1999
10518 Scott, I did not get a chance to listen to the call and the replay isn't upGVTucker-2/18/1999
10517 Olu, Presstek is losing credibility. They warned last year at this time that Brent-2/18/1999
10516 Olu, The conference call was very clear about the direction of the industry andSG-2/18/1999
10515 <i>With the statements out of Presstek, I don't think it hit theOlu Emuleomo-2/18/1999
10514 Olu, My two cents says gamblers were buying recently hoping for a surprise outBrent-2/18/1999
10513 <i>What kind of money is buying today?</i> <i>What kind of moOlu Emuleomo-2/18/1999
10512 Some random thoughts: Q4 numbers: Ouch! That had to hurt. Presstek lost $5.7Brent-2/18/1999
10511 Dear Olu, Sorry about the namecalling. What kind of money is buying today? WhJames C. Shircliff-2/18/1999
10510 [by me]<<, the fact is that on a sequential basis, Heidelberg revenues weGVTucker-2/18/1999
10509 James, you have a firm grasp on the obvious, NOT. For the last time, please briSG-2/18/1999
10508 Same gizmo, Scott, you told us about that one last year. You brought my privatJames C. Shircliff-2/18/1999
10507 GV, Nice try but... <<, the fact is that on a sequential basis, HeidelbeSG-2/18/1999
10506 What a hideous quarter. Revenues were horrible. Although management tries to GVTucker-2/18/1999
10505 HUDSON, N.H., Feb. 18 /PRNewswire/ -- Presstek, Inc. (Nasdaq: PRST), a leadSG-2/18/1999
10504 <<And then in your next post, you re-post a patent that you have posted bSG-2/18/1999
10503 Dear Mr. Ricker, You are correct on all counts. Jim James C. Shircliff-2/17/1999
10502 Olu doesn't need me to speak for him, but as one who has been exclusively oLarry Ricker-2/17/1999
10501 Dear Scott, You keep saying how much I lost shorting PRst ... bad news ... I MAJames C. Shircliff-2/17/1999
10500 <i>Olu, how the heck would you know if it was "smart" money? Olu Emuleomo-2/17/1999
10499 United States Patent 5,870,955 Williams, et. al. Feb. 16, 1999 ----------------SG-2/17/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News