Loral Space & Communications | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks
Loral Space & Communications

An SI Board Since April 1996

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans	Symbol
10852	82	0	LOR

Emcee: Don Limb	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Market Data Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
10527	I also am looking into ways to protect shareholder interests. Contact me at blac	CChalmers	-	7/17/2003
10526	why not. <g> who knows. might actually make sense.	Box-By-The-Riviera™	-	7/16/2003
10525	<i>post the address on yahoo where so many yahoo's seem to congregate&	crm114	-	7/16/2003
10524	dude, that is cruel ... while I am suffering severe pain from Loral ...	quasi-geezer	-	7/16/2003
10523	you're fired. that's too cruel even for me. go find another place to wo	Box-By-The-Riviera™	-	7/16/2003
10522	yah dude so you can fly it up that gaping hole of yours	10K a day	-	7/16/2003
10521	if you do... post the address on yahoo where so many yahoo's seem to congreg	Box-By-The-Riviera™	-	7/16/2003
10520	Anybody know if a shareholder committee is being formed. I could create a thread	SafetyAgentMan	-	7/16/2003
10519	do I get to keep one of the satellites before they sell it off ... ouch, ouch, o	quasi-geezer	-	7/16/2003
10518	Can anybody explain why Bernard put the company and shareholders through the exp	Selectric II	-	7/16/2003
10517	The shares are trading on the pink sheets at 31 cents: pinksheets.com	Steven Rachbach	-	7/16/2003
10516	<<Chapter 11 typically results in shareholders being wiped out and the cre	Mr. Sunshine	-	7/16/2003
10515	<<My LOR & MIR went up in smoke the same day ... >> Ouch. Hope	Mr. Sunshine	-	7/16/2003
10514	>>Because you equated no loss of equity with Mr. Schwartz being a master o	Tahoetech	-	7/16/2003
10513	Because you equated no loss of equity with Mr. Schwartz being a master of financ	Selectric II	-	7/16/2003
10512	the equity lost "value", crm...	Tahoetech	-	7/16/2003
10511	>>You still labor under the unfortunate misconception that Mr. Schwartz is	Tahoetech	-	7/16/2003
10510	agreed. if that does happen. could mean big bucks in time. but, until that hap	Box-By-The-Riviera™	-	7/16/2003
10509	i wouldn't stand in your way <g>	Box-By-The-Riviera™	-	7/16/2003
10508	<i>... if there is no loss of equity...</i> You mean in addition to	crm114	-	7/16/2003
10507	<i>if there is no loss of equity then we should consider ourselves fortuna	Selectric II	-	7/15/2003
10506	I resigned myself long ago to the "possibility" of a LOR chapt 11 with	Tahoetech	-	7/15/2003
10505	Seriously folks, what do you think the next 6 mos. holds for LOR?	ebg51	-	7/15/2003
10504	How about a wooden stake through his heart? eom	ebg51	-	7/15/2003
10503	with an equity stake or without one?	Box-By-The-Riviera™	-	7/15/2003

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):