SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Presstek -- Stock of the Decade??
An SI Board Since March 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
11098 20 0 PRST
Emcee:  SI (no user) Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
10623 Correction, The 74-Karat press will use the waterless PEARL-dry, as does the QMNEIL MACK-3/27/1999
10622 A must read regarding the 3-26-99 latest info on the PEARLgold plate from the PNEIL MACK-3/27/1999
10621 Neil, you are correct. My estimate of year 2000 is very conservative at 88m in SG-3/26/1999
10620 <<My hindsight is perfect, you agree. Been that way for 3 years now>&gSG-3/26/1999
10619 Scott, My hindsight is perfect, you agree. Been that way for 3 years now. AnJames C. Shircliff-3/26/1999
10618 More importantly, can PRST sell plates at a profit yet? GVTucker-3/26/1999
10617 Scott, Your numbers are in my opinion very conservative as I believe the instaNEIL MACK-3/26/1999
10616 <<And if there are 900 installs, where are the earnings? Would 900 more iSG-3/26/1999
10615 Scott says: <<I see continued accumulation of PRST shares.>> Scott,James C. Shircliff-3/25/1999
10614 I see continued accumulation of PRST shares. The real number should be 900 insSG-3/25/1999
10613 >>>What are you seeing on PRST? Brent, I agree with you! I have recenOlu Emuleomo-3/23/1999
10612 Olu, What are you seeing on PRST? I see today and tomorrow as very important Brent-3/23/1999
10611 Thanks GV!!! Great post! Jim James C. Shircliff-3/22/1999
10610 <<James, man am I glad YOU are the one who asked first.>> No problJames C. Shircliff-3/22/1999
10609 James, man am I glad YOU are the one who asked first. SG SG-3/22/1999
10608 Jim: "If you can read this, you're overeducated." GVTucker-3/22/1999
10607 What an education !! And to think I was only viewing this thread to see if anytPaul Casi-3/22/1999
10606 Dear GV, I am lazy... don't make me go find my Latin book ... would you plJames C. Shircliff-3/22/1999
10605 Scott and Jim: <i>Sic hoc legere scis nimium eriditions habes.</i>GVTucker-3/22/1999
10604 Paul, I told you I would be critical when needed. I keep thinking about your poSG-3/21/1999
10603 Dear Paul, Welcome! I won't take offense at your "Bastard" in LJames C. Shircliff-3/20/1999
10602 Scott. Believe me, I had no clue from any of your PRst posts that you were a mJames C. Shircliff-3/20/1999
10601 Paul, thanks a ton. I hope to remain bullish and even critical of PRST when neeSG-3/19/1999
10600 SG-- Great post --please keep it up. "Illegitimi non carborundum". Paul Casi-3/19/1999
10599 >>>Truth is I've got so much invested I can;t quit now. TrOlu Emuleomo-3/17/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):