SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Applied Magnetics Corp
An SI Board Since September 1995
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
12298 24 0 APM
Emcee:  Raymond Thomas Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
10623 <i> I agree with your ultimate assessment of APM.</i> Thanks. I aRational-12/5/1997
10622 I see that WDC has released info that they too have internal MR capacity. LikeMark Adams-12/5/1997
10621 I agree with your ultimate assessment of APM. From what little I really know, Zakrosian-12/5/1997
10620 ...<i> but <b> I think </b> things have changed far more thanRational-12/5/1997
10619 <<The transition to MR is taking place more quickly than anticipated and EyeDrMike-12/5/1997
10618 <<they are ready to mass-produce MR heads.>>I'm sure you'reZakrosian-12/5/1997
10617 Mark: The CEO (I think a WS finance guy) knew that TFIs were much more profitaRational-12/5/1997
10616 Mike - Mark might be referring to this release of last month biz.yahoo.com ThisZakrosian-12/5/1997
10615 << But APM has invested and continues to invest in making MR capacity avaEyeDrMike-12/5/1997
10614 The MR wafer is just the first step in the process. The wafer goes to the far Dave Chanoux-12/5/1997
10613 Brian - <<How many programs do they have in 1.7 GB TFI heads?>> WDT Bowl-12/5/1997
10612 Hi Jon, < On the other hand the longs(like you for example) are hoping for Don Earl-12/5/1997
10611 APM's price is going down more. The reason is APM always keeps investors inPeter Yang-12/5/1997
10610 Just some facts to counter some of the recent garbage put forth by recent posteMark Adams-12/5/1997
10609 <i>Can someone tell me what's wrong with my logic?</i> Todd, Jonathan Bird-12/5/1997
10608 <i>Are you short?</i> You must be pretty new to the APM threads huJonathan Bird-12/4/1997
10607 Jon, <i> In the end we are all speculating more then we would probably lRational-12/4/1997
10606 Brian, Good questions. I hope you will post answers if and when you get them. Rational-12/4/1997
10605 Sankar, <<BTW, APM web-site is very informative.>> Not really! I Brian Lempel-12/4/1997
10604 Sankar, <i>If the stock traded at 40% of the then book value, the marketJonathan Bird-12/4/1997
10603 T Bowl: I have read all these. IMHO, you need to read my post once more. If Rational-12/4/1997
10602 Sankar - <<WDC might have waited until APM could produce MR and GMR in voT Bowl-12/4/1997
10601 <i> Using an ASP of around $11 or so shows they produced *around*: 650k, Rational-12/4/1997
10600 <<This shows that APM is already producing MR in volume and its higher voT Bowl-12/4/1997
10599 To all: This is from APM web-site: <i> Currently Applied Magnetics has Rational-12/4/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):