SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
INTEL FOR TECHNICIANS
An SI Board Since December 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1513 9 0 INTC
Emcee:  jmac Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1063 jmac, Right here. It took more than a minute, sorry -g-. I am long, I am notSteelBlueIce-5/9/1997
1062 Thomas, On another BB, someone pointed out a overnight gap 147 to 148 that migRoad Walker-5/9/1997
1061 MSFT and INTC have decoupled over the past few weeks. As for the bugs, we'jmac-5/9/1997
1060 jmac, Bad news for Microsoft. WIN Magazine article I picked up of my on line nNight Writer-5/8/1997
1059 IMO, time value will begin to erode more quickly once you get 6 weeks in or clojmac-5/8/1997
1058 I have been investing traditionally for a long time. I decided a few weeks aKM-5/8/1997
1057 I agree but I think the consolidation has to last through option expiration. Ajmac-5/8/1997
1056 He will be here any minitue now.Sonki-5/8/1997
1055 Jerry Gatto---Where are you man?jmac-5/8/1997
1054 To all: if INTC can maintain a tight range - 155-160 for the next few days - I&dppl-5/8/1997
1053 You forgot resistence at 200 very soon!Sonki-5/8/1997
1052 Nice analysis, John. I would by another 100s at 156. But at 150, I would LoadMonsieurGonzo-5/8/1997
1051 John, I agree with everything but I would put first resistance at 160, not 159 jmac-5/8/1997
1050 Tomorrow's news release will be key regardless of MMs. But, iff that was njmac-5/8/1997
1049 OK, I'm not very good at this, but the support/resistence seems pretty obviRoad Walker-5/8/1997
1048 Agreed. Right now, with INTC nearing 160, the MMs stand to lose quite a bit. Thomas M.-5/8/1997
1047 I am staring to believe that the MMs need the move down on INTC to cover the 15jmac-5/7/1997
1046 First, todays finish looked a bit ugly. I was hoping to get in on a rebound aftmozek-5/7/1997
1045 All: JMAC set up this thread as a forum for technical analysis of INTC (hence Thomas M.-5/7/1997
1044 TO ALL: I haven't seen much in the way of TA on this thread in a long timejmac-5/7/1997
1043 Lin, They have to be very careful here. If they set a precedent then in the fuKevin-5/7/1997
1042 This time INTEL might get around the BUG problem. The timing of finding the bulin luo-5/7/1997
1041 >>>scovered that JAVA Programs run fastest on Pentuim chips<<<Urlman-5/7/1997
1040 Slide Rule, RE:"Heard today on 6pm CNBC summary that worldwide chip volumKevin-5/6/1997
1039 Slide, Nowadays you can find the global numbers every month on news.com The SIbexx-5/6/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News