SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Rockwell-Spins off Conexant (CNXT)
An SI Board Since January 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2013 83 0 CNXT
Emcee:  jas244 Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1063 The clue with CNXT and the market is that they are more linked than they appearDavid W. Taylor-5/11/2000
1062 Couldn't answer. Considering CNXT is in a position as good as or better MeDroogies-5/11/2000
1061 Granted the fundamentals look good for CNXT, but the tape action is terrible. Asilverstein-5/11/2000
1060 I don't remember a time, in the last 20 years (my investment period), thaMeDroogies-5/11/2000
1059 Once again, that condescing tone prevails.... This was exactly the point IMeDroogies-5/11/2000
1058 I'll ask a simple question...is it part of the core inflation number? IMeDroogies-5/11/2000
1057 Great explanation, gpowell. Thanks for the post. It make more sense to me nowDavid W. Taylor-5/10/2000
1056 These charges can also be a result of the accounting procedures used to accountgpowell-5/10/2000
1055 >> one time charges are something that have been commonplace over the lasDavid W. Taylor-5/10/2000
1054 I would LOVE a list of the people that bought at the bottom and sold at the topDavid W. Taylor-5/10/2000
1053 >> Right, but it isn't considered a structural portion of the inflatiDavid W. Taylor-5/10/2000
1052 Not true, one time charges are something that have been commonplace over the MeDroogies-5/10/2000
1051 The truly funny thing is that if the stock were up, you'd be nowhere hereMeDroogies-5/10/2000
1050 That is correct. However, it is reflected in cash somewhere. That is, when MeDroogies-5/10/2000
1049 Right, but it isn't considered a structural portion of the inflation numbMeDroogies-5/10/2000
1048 I was kidding about cutting him slack. eommts362-5/10/2000
1047 Will do....back to lurking on this thread for me......The Ox-5/10/2000
1046 Cut David some slack. The carnage we are experiencing now is nothing compared mts362-5/10/2000
1045 I don't feel personally attacked by your message but I do think that, from The Ox-5/10/2000
1044 <I>This has become a very common practice in the last year or so. Before mts362-5/10/2000
1043 >> Analysts usually take these factors out in calculating the intrinsic vDavid W. Taylor-5/10/2000
1042 Morning Michael, I told you to sell and wait to buy back two months ago. If yDavid W. Taylor-5/10/2000
1041 David, as far as I can tell, the these are one-time charges that are non-cash eRoger L. Chuchen-5/10/2000
1040 <i>I was just trying to gauge the level of bloodshed.</i> So, you The Ox-5/10/2000
1039 <I>I don't get it.</I> That has been obvious for a while. Chegpowell-5/10/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News