SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Applix is back in action
An SI Board Since February 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
3014 28 0 APLX
Emcee:  Magnifique Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1064 Geroge: the stock seemed to stabilize today; recovering nicely from the initiaRobert K. Schott-3/26/1997
1063 DENIAL-The first stage. APLX Investors are akin to passengers on the Titanic tGeorge Sepetjian-3/26/1997
1062 Warren: witty! I agree with you that the ways of analysts are oft times perplRobert K. Schott-3/26/1997
1061 Let me see if I understand... They tell us to buy at, say, $35, $30, $25, $15, Warren Whitney-3/26/1997
1060 Gary: yes, I believe it is, Gary. I have no idea where the stock will close, Robert K. Schott-3/26/1997
1059 I agree-Based on N's estimate, qtrly annualized sales plunge from $6.15 to Gary Burton-3/26/1997
1058 P.S. I'm buying calls just as soon as I can raise some cash! best regardsRobert K. Schott-3/26/1997
1057 To all: I just read a news item--perhaps the long awaited "bombshell"Robert K. Schott-3/26/1997
1056 Gary, I've been in APLX in the 20's. Luckily didn't get burned. Aj g cordes-3/25/1997
1055 Don't you just love these preannouncement seasons! A number of pieces of frGary Burton-3/25/1997
1054 Ken: thanks for the input. if your previous posts are accuarte--that this salRobert K. Schott-3/25/1997
1053 Michael: I would say that your assertion that "the bad news" is alreRobert K. Schott-3/25/1997
1052 Excel/Realtime, etc - I recall a number of people have asked about who is workicarl griffith-3/25/1997
1051 I can verify Tom's comments that turnover in the Applix salesforce has beenR. Michael Knipp-3/25/1997
1050 Robert, >although not stated implicitly, your remarks seem to indicate yourTom Klempay-3/25/1997
1049 Spot on. The syndrome/analogy is commonly known as - 'big fish in a small carl griffith-3/25/1997
1048 Robert, You had asked what he sold it's OLAP. Maybe it's a lack of new Weekapaug-3/25/1997
1047 <<in light of no substantive report of negative conditions with the compaMichael Burry-3/25/1997
1046 Roger: things do not sound good near term? Mr. Klempay speaks of the difficulRobert K. Schott-3/24/1997
1045 Tom: Appreciate your insight. Things do not sound good near term. Wish that we Jolly Roger-3/24/1997
1044 Tom: although not stated implicitly, your remarks seem to indicate your beliefRobert K. Schott-3/24/1997
1043 Robert and all, As a former Applix shareholder, I've watched this thread pTom Klempay-3/24/1997
1042 Fred: thanks for the education. I shall try to utilize it the next time I havRobert K. Schott-3/24/1997
1041 But NSCP is almost rationally priced nowadays ... a better suitor, also ... sorcarl griffith-3/24/1997
1040 Carl: great post; very interesting--but you're breaking my heart! every dRobert K. Schott-3/24/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):