SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Winstar Comm. (WCII)
An SI Board Since April 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
12468 35 0 WCIIQ
Emcee:  MARK JALBERT Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
10693 ** OT ** Wireless Auctions in lower freq. *** For all you auction watchers: ThuDreamWeaver-3/13/1999
10692 LS - <I>My gut feeling is that we will see a $60. price by year end.<limtex-3/12/1999
10691 Dear limex, "In what I suppose is therefore a sad summary those 120,000 sLouis savarese-3/12/1999
10690 SB - When did the secondary stock have to be paid? Regards, L limtex-3/12/1999
10689 "I do disagree with the gentlemen who said in one of the last posts that tSteven Bowen-3/12/1999
10688 Bernard - Thanks. I get frustrated not ny the long term prospct about which Ilimtex-3/12/1999
10687 daffy, Welcome to the thread. But with all due respects, please read back 1-2 gauguin-3/12/1999
10686 Professor: Agreed. But in the meantime, anyone long is at market risk, as some silicon warrior-3/12/1999
10685 Finally someone sane! Thank you for the info. You are so right. daffy-3/12/1999
10684 Thanks for the thoughts, I'll pass on the suggestion! I truly believe therdaffy-3/12/1999
10683 Hi limtex: Actually, there are very rational explanations for the behavior of Bernard Levy-3/12/1999
10682 daffy - <I>Disappointing,but 33 is a lot better than 10!</I> Calimtex-3/12/1999
10681 Ellis - I don't think there is any change in the fundamentals but its clelimtex-3/12/1999
10680 Barbara Just wondering, if you worked for MCI, did you work with Nate? Do you daffy-3/12/1999
10679 What the heck happened at the last few minutes of the day??? We dropped a wholeEllis Rudman-3/12/1999
10678 Barabara **************OT************* There is a guy over on the SNDK thread limtex-3/12/1999
10677 Mike - First of all, thanks for the fresh perspective. It's always welcomeTheSlowLane-3/12/1999
10676 JMD, Thanks, as a single, never married woman, I can identify with never knowigauguin-3/11/1999
10675 Hi Folks, I'm a newcomer and enter with trepidation for fear that this postJMD-3/11/1999
10674 barabara Don't worry about the laments here. This is just a modern versionlimtex-3/11/1999
10673 limtex, Ali et al, FYI in this month's Telephony, Rick Hanna, SVP Sales &agauguin-3/11/1999
10672 Way, way off topic But since I'm having so much fun with this, I thought Ij.d.robbins-3/11/1999
10671 Someone here left a post about their new printer. It sounded great, and now I Bill Holton-3/11/1999
10670 L: What you describe is quite common. The issuer and the underwriters only wansilicon warrior-3/11/1999
10669 SW - As I've said for some time I happen to think this is one of the grealimtex-3/11/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News