Presstek -- Stock of the Decade?? | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks
Presstek -- Stock of the Decade??

An SI Board Since March 1996

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans	Symbol
11098	20	0	PRST

Emcee: SI (no user)	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Market Data Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
10698	Jim, The plate revenue I stated, is after the marketing cost is first removed b	NEIL MACK	-	4/26/1999
10697	>>>And the stock is still in the toilet<<< Comical indeed. B	Olu Emuleomo	-	4/24/1999
10696	Let's take Neil's optimistic assumptions: <<we look at over $47,0	James C. Shircliff	-	4/24/1999
10695	Hello Presstek People! I was just cruising through this forum after 3 years. It	Leon Vincent	-	4/23/1999
10694	Scott, maybe I can tie in your last post..... Appears that the (HDIA) Heidelbe	NEIL MACK	-	4/23/1999
10693	Comical: haven't bothered to read this thread in months, Same bull argume	paul abramowitz	-	4/22/1999
10692	The following article, just written on Graphic Arts Monthly is a must read rega	NEIL MACK	-	4/20/1999
10691	Scott, RE:<<I do hope for much better than what we get but after all it i	GVTucker	-	4/20/1999
10690	Come on Scott, is it really because the IR department is small or is it that Pr	Brent	-	4/20/1999
10689	Brent, You have very valid points, but............... <<Does Microsoft w	SG	-	4/20/1999
10688	George, frustration will not help anyone. When you have done enough fact findin	SG	-	4/20/1999
10687	Neil, It is an equally bad strategy for management to be secretive and not pro	Brent	-	4/20/1999
10686	Neil, put some substance in your words for a change. Don't shortchange thi	George T. Santamaria	-	4/20/1999
10685	<<I believe that in future months, when they do announce staggering posit	James C. Shircliff	-	4/20/1999
10684	Ya know, NEIL, I thought I'd really just let this thread go its own way, bu	GVTucker	-	4/20/1999
10683	George, It became quite clear to many of the "bulls" that traveled to	NEIL MACK	-	4/20/1999
10682	We are naively open to all manner of speculation and optimism. So very little	George T. Santamaria	-	4/20/1999
10681	Testing 1,2,3. Not much to say, bulls? Whatever this quarter's earnings, we	James C. Shircliff	-	4/19/1999
10680	Neil, an interesting article from Dotprint about the importance of saving time	SG	-	4/17/1999
10679	Mad2, It was fun, maybe we'll run into each on another thread. Good luck,	Brent	-	4/16/1999
10678	To Jim, GV, Brent and all who have objectively posted on this thread. I'm r	Mad2	-	4/16/1999
10677	Neil, The move to smaller runs in 4 color seems to be in the final stages of bl	SG	-	4/15/1999
10676	But this one may be the best ever: <<To: Gary Kao (57 ) From: NEIL MACK	James C. Shircliff	-	4/15/1999
10675	Dear Scott, You say, <<Neil, one of your best posts ever.>> May I r	James C. Shircliff	-	4/15/1999
10674	Neil, one of your best posts ever. And there have been plenty. It seems that yo	SG	-	4/15/1999

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):