SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA)
An SI Board Since January 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2646 270 0 NVDA
Emcee:  Frank Sully Type:  Moderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1071"single digits is almost a certainty<i>" Would seem so but conjeffersonkeith-7/30/2002
1070Well the last comparable revenue quarter might be 3Q ended October 28, 2001. WhiBWAC-7/30/2002
1069<i>I don’t know how the analysts will view all of this but I can’t see it robbie-7/30/2002
1068The way I see it so far is that NVDA expected sales of $567 million and earningsRon Dior-7/30/2002
1067<i> Though I am not happy with this I am glad that this was not company spLKO-7/30/2002
1066Kinda need that important info though don;t we?BWAC-7/30/2002
1065No they wouldn't give any number break downs until earnings. We will have tRon Dior-7/30/2002
1064Did they quantify how much the inventory writeoff reduced earnings?BWAC-7/30/2002
1063<i>People wanted confirmation of rumors...the price action was the confirmRon Dior-7/30/2002
1062People wanted confirmation of rumors...the price action was the confirmation...robbie-7/30/2002
1061Mean earnings Estimate was 40c from yahoo and 43c from SI. Now they are warningSBHX-7/30/2002
1060Ron, What were the original revenue expectations? JoeJoe NYC-7/30/2002
1059Tuesday July 30, 4:25 pm Eastern Time Press Release SOURCE: NVIDIA Corporation NRon Dior-7/30/2002
1058nvda warns i think...headed to yhoo to get the news..stk halted.Venkie-7/30/2002
1057BWAC I must disagree. Do you really thing the company does not realize that theRon Dior-7/30/2002
1056<NVDA is doing the right thing in just letting the earnings speak for themselBWAC-7/30/2002
1055<i>WHERE ARE they (NVDA) now ' banging out parts ' if not using TSRon Dior-7/30/2002
1054WHERE ARE they (NVDA) now ' banging out parts ' if not using TSMC? That Robert O-7/30/2002
1053<b>UMC apparently told investors that Nvidia will cut its orders with numbRon Dior-7/30/2002
1052<i>TSM has gone out of their way to finger NVDA this time out. They have eTechieGuy-alt-7/30/2002
1051All of them are good points. I guess, come Aug 15th (or whenever NVDA has to sigTechieGuy-alt-7/29/2002
1050NVDA’s weakness is due to the following: 1) Rumors of doubt about SEC still notRon Dior-7/29/2002
1049NVDA has been acting quite weak though. When do they report earnings? I've TechieGuy-alt-7/29/2002
1048Steve keep the thread informed. I think this could be a large piece of the puzzRon Dior-7/29/2002
1047Ron, Nice note. Didn't remember that blurb about UMC at all. Hope it is stiArtslaw-7/29/2002
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News