SFAD Breaking into the INTERNET in a big way!

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks
SFAD Breaking into the INTERNET in a big way!

An SI Board Since December 1998

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans	Symbol
1322	5	0	SFAD

Emcee: David Sirk	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Market Data Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
1072	With the market up today, the sky's the limit with this stock! They have	Nash Bridges	-	1/15/1999
1071	Read the Nov. quarterly--you will see there are about 705M shares without dupli	Andrew H	-	1/15/1999
1070	That's right! I didn't do the math. I just saw the PR posted on another	Life Coach	-	1/15/1999
1069	""""with one trillion of its shares (20%) owned by its foun	DoubleOddBuck	-	1/15/1999
1068	Here's a stock with over THREE TRILLION shares trading at $1.00. So it just	Life Coach	-	1/15/1999
1067	Was alerted to this stock on Wednesday and was lucky to get a chunk of s	Ken Walker in Ontario	-	1/15/1999
1066	Yeah the only similarity being a huge float The point being popular valuation,	tRaDiAc	-	1/14/1999
1065	Yes, I guess this stock does resemble CSCO! Thanks for the clarification! (:>	Andrew H	-	1/14/1999
1064	The same way CSCO trades with 1.2B shares outstanding. The SFAD concept is a go	tRaDiAc	-	1/14/1999
1063	NASH BRIDGES.. nice posts. I agree with you. I am going to hold my position whi	kami	-	1/14/1999
1062	Kami, Respectfully, even if they have good ideas, with 705 million shares and	Andrew H	-	1/14/1999
1061	Glad I did not mislead the thread. Is it also true that in addition to the 705	Andrew H	-	1/14/1999
1060	Larry, unfortunately, there are people who have their own agendas and will eith	Nash Bridges	-	1/14/1999
1059	bernie, that means if this is the original investment before the split now will	RickV	-	1/14/1999
1058	Bottom line folks, if you owned SFAD BEFORE the reverse split, today's pric	Bernie Bildman	-	1/14/1999
1057	Andrew.. I invested in SFAD at $0.05 and I really believe SFAD has great ideas	kami	-	1/14/1999
1056	For everyone's reading: from the SEC Filing Nov 16 1998 <i>STOCKHOL	Mitch Aunger	-	1/14/1999
1055	New to this board and my first post on any board. I own SFAD at .09 and after	bjkelly	-	1/14/1999
1054	I feel badly if I have misled anyone--do you have a specific citation which wou	Andrew H	-	1/14/1999
1053	You were originally correct about the float. There was a 10:1 reverse split, bu	Vandyman	-	1/14/1999
1052	we are all hopefully big boys and girls, but again, it is very irresponsible to	Larry S.	-	1/14/1999
1051	I am still not certain about the actual float, but I may have been using old fi	Andrew H	-	1/14/1999
1050	Andrew, it was very irresponsible of you to come on so strongly about the huge	Larry S.	-	1/14/1999
1049	Looks like they may have done a 10 for 1 reverse. That would account for much o	Andrew H	-	1/14/1999
1048		Andrew H	-	1/14/1999

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):