SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Fonix:Voice Recognition Product (FONX)
An SI Board Since May 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
3347 45 0 FONX
Emcee:  Dave Rebok Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1072 Marc: Again, well stated. I also agree with you regarding the MF board. As one john harris-8/10/1997
1071 To everybody: It's nice to see that the longs, shorts and neutrals can coeFairways9-8/10/1997
1070 Parx: Can you cite in professional technical or professional financial journalsjohn harris-8/9/1997
1069 I think the point most of us who've been around a while are making is that Mitchell D. Wilcox-8/9/1997
1068 John, I was referring to the psychological effect where tech stocks can really Mark Cox-8/9/1997
1067 To those still long on fonix, What your money COULD be doing: LHSPF - up 40% Dr. Bob-8/9/1997
1066 <<<As for the actual effect of the millions as opposed to billions whijohn harris-8/8/1997
1065 John, I'm afraid my 'facts' are not facts. I have been talking to tMark Cox-8/8/1997
1064 Hopefully they have more important things to do. I don't think Mr. PinkDr. Bob-8/8/1997
1063 There was a poster on AOL a while ago, who got burned for making defamatory comHunter Trout-8/8/1997
1062 Thanks Bob for responding to Pinko. I couldn't have said it better. MarcFairways9-8/8/1997
1061 Mr. Pink, In all this time, you can't have made much money on your short pDr. Bob-8/8/1997
1060 Dear F9: You could have saved considerable $$$$$ and time had you headed Mr. pMr. Pink-8/8/1997
1059 And one more question, Parx (sorry for piling on!) - even if there are OEM dealDr. Bob-8/8/1997
1058 Hi Parx, just a point or two if I may: <<<Unfortunately if something john harris-8/8/1997
1057 Welcome Wayne Grennan, Marc, We become almost abusive when we're frustrateMark Cox-8/7/1997
1056 Marc: I, too, have done countless hours of research and I agree with every wordjohn harris-8/7/1997
1055 Mark, I think you have stated the case very accurately and dispassionately. BDr. Bob-8/7/1997
1054 Wayne, Welcome to the board. We appreciate your viewpoints. In my opinion, tFairways9-8/7/1997
1053 Mitch: I bought my shares in March, and began following FONX earlier than thatWayne Grennan-8/7/1997
1052 David: It is not uncommon that FONX is not mentioned in such professional articjohn harris-8/7/1997
1051 Wayne. I'd love to believe you but the company is telling us the engineers Mitchell D. Wilcox-8/7/1997
1050 All: We are dealing with engineering progress here. THERE IS NO ROLE FOR MAMAGWayne Grennan-8/7/1997
1049 Check out Red Herring online, there's an article on voice-recognition. DonDavid S.-8/6/1997
1048 On the AOL board, an announcement of a major investment banker was all but promFairways9-8/6/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):