SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Presstek -- Stock of the Decade??
An SI Board Since March 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
11098 20 0 PRST
Emcee:  SI (no user) Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
10723 "or Larry, or Mo (Carlton and his MOmentum), or Curly?" Or Robert HSteve Andrew-4/30/1999
10722 <<voulez vous investee avec Booobbbbeeeee.>> or Larry, or Mo (CarlJames C. Shircliff-4/29/1999
10721 Throw a dart, or blindfold a drunken monkey and let him pick a stock out of theSteve Andrew-4/29/1999
10720 <Good luck in your search at finding a better play than that.> For a groBrent-4/29/1999
10719 Scott, I haven't had a position in PRST in 6 months, you're right, buBrent-4/29/1999
10718 Brent, its funny that you had the moxie to stay (no position to speak of)througSG-4/29/1999
10717 <Is it false?> Apparently so. <Follow your instincts, they rarely leBrent-4/29/1999
10716 Wow, glad I didn't buy Presstek the other day. I wanted to believe it was Brent-4/29/1999
10715 Neil, just a bit of info I found on the net and from an un-impeachable source. SG-4/27/1999
10714 ah Scotty Boy,,my Scotty boy.... Still sour after all these points. I hear BobSteve Andrew-4/27/1999
10713 <<GV does not annoy me.>> Dang. I'll try and be a little moreGVTucker-4/27/1999
10712 Steve, GV does not annoy me. I enjoy his "mostly" balanced financial SG-4/27/1999
10711 Brent, you came on board here with a post that said something to the effect of SG-4/27/1999
10710 GV Keep posting, if for no other reason that to annoy that ravaging fool WrongSteve Andrew-4/27/1999
10709 Scott, RE:<<Why? no kidding, what's the draw for you and why stick arGVTucker-4/27/1999
10708 Scott, you say: <<In my opinion, failure to capitulate on this premise isJames C. Shircliff-4/27/1999
10707 GV, why do you hang around here? Your bearish sentiment has been littered with SG-4/27/1999
10706 Brent, RE:<<Do any of you think Presstek might be a good buy right now? &GVTucker-4/26/1999
10705 Neil, Sure PRST increased e&d to $16mm but the year before profits were $1Brent-4/26/1999
10704 GV, Paul, Jim, other 'bears', Do any of you think Presstek might be a Brent-4/26/1999
10703 GV.....Presstek spent $16,000,000 on engineering and development costs and ran NEIL MACK-4/26/1999
10702 To put it simply: 1997 = Higher Kit sales + Lower Plate Sales = Profit 1998 =Brent-4/26/1999
10701 NEIL, RE:<<please tell me why Presstek is required to state their "nGVTucker-4/26/1999
10700 GV, I obviously am not a accountant, however, please tell me why Presstek is reNEIL MACK-4/26/1999
10699 NEIL, RE:<< I believe Presstek revenue per plate is $7.60 after marketingGVTucker-4/26/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):