SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
WAVX Anyone?
An SI Board Since May 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
11417 80 0 WAVX
Emcee:  Scott Rafe Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
10742OT to Marty.. Quite time or Quiet time? Have I caught the linguistic trapeze aTony McFadden-9/19/2000
10741Thank-you Unclevername, The link worked just fine. These technophile conferencMarty Lee-9/18/2000
10740Marty, Re: WaveXpress demo, from Dave Nadig at Metamarkets community.metamarkeUncleverName-9/17/2000
10739Why ask why? <b>Does anyone here or on the RB DD have some report of how Marty Lee-9/17/2000
10738Dave, Help me understand your post! Over $150,000 PROFIT shorting this stock andArthur Radley-9/17/2000
10737Texas Dude - A simple question to you. Why post here? TIA SalSparkle-9/17/2000
10736Are you saying, TD that you never shorted WAVX when it was in the rally mode, saSparkle-9/17/2000
10735Ode to guess who... Nothin' to do Nothin; to do Put some mustard in my shoeMarty Lee-9/16/2000
10734David--yes, exactly so. Wave is, essentially, an R&D company right now--butecommerceman-9/15/2000
10733Texass, Referencing a company's current revenue is totally and completely iDavid Howe-9/15/2000
10732Hey Dude, watch your back, err, I mean Biotechs! ;>)Jesse Livermore-9/15/2000
10731You apparently don't understand jack. [eom]24601-9/14/2000
10730Well at least I now understand. WAVX's falsehoods(deployment promises)are fiArthur Radley-9/14/2000
10729TexasDude: I am about to conclude that you are not honest. Your bit of sophistr24601-9/14/2000
10728You state..."You're not trusted." Would you care to discuss deploArthur Radley-9/14/2000
10727TexasDude: Quit changing horses. Justify your Claugus-fallacy about Visa. You 24601-9/14/2000
1072624, I must chuckle over you bringing up the word FACT. But speaking of that worArthur Radley-9/14/2000
10725TexasDude: are you filibustering? I hope so, because otherwise you would be int24601-9/14/2000
1072424, You assail Claugus and now a year later you state WAVX does not merely handlArthur Radley-9/14/2000
10723TexasDude: Claugus cannot now claim that his was merely a technical play, either24601-9/14/2000
10722Merely go back and read my post on WAVX...I clearly stated the TWO times when I Arthur Radley-9/14/2000
10721Amen! Besides, without a hardcopy of his/her trades in my hand it's all hotBuzzVA-9/14/2000
10720TexasDude: You claim to have done well on WAVX. You presently seem to explain yo24601-9/14/2000
10719Bear with me TD, but we suffered through dozens of posts months ago at Raging BuD.Lu-9/14/2000
10718Tex--no chiding from this boy, I just pointed out that you overstated your pointecommerceman-9/14/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News