SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Applied Magnetics Corp
An SI Board Since September 1995
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
12298 24 0 APM
Emcee:  Raymond Thomas Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
10748 Look back at : exchange2000.com It was posted on 03dec97. On 04dec97 we saw tT Bowl-12/7/1997
10747 Hi Mike, I fully agree. Anything that has to to do with a company, or the markDon Earl-12/7/1997
10746 <<Dear EYE Dr. Mike: I am confused. I thought this was the APM site. PerhEyeDrMike-12/7/1997
10745 <i>Dear Glenn: Thanx again, getting better all the time!! JDN</i> Glenn D. Rudolph-12/7/1997
10744 JDN: If you go back to the discussion I think you'll find that Mike's eZakrosian-12/7/1997
10743 <<2.1GB(TFI) => AC12100, AC23200, AC24300, AC36400>> Oops. SorT Bowl-12/7/1997
10742 Dear Glenn: Thanx again, getting better all the time!! JDNJDN-12/7/1997
10741 Dear Glenn: Thanx for the info. Means APM currently selling under 9X's goJDN-12/7/1997
10740 Dear EYE Dr. Mike: I am confused. I thought this was the APM site. Perhaps yJDN-12/7/1997
10739 Jon: <i> What this means is that the process yields on the 1.7 TFI ANDRational-12/6/1997
10738 <i>Jon - Here's the only source I can recall for APM's decision nJonathan Bird-12/6/1997
10737 <i>APM simply compared its yield on their TFI heads with that of MR headsJonathan Bird-12/6/1997
10736 Zakrosian: This link also tells something very important on MR and yield. If CRational-12/6/1997
10735 Jon - Here's the only source I can recall for APM's decision not to devZakrosian-12/6/1997
10734 It would be great to be able to make such a comparison, but I don't think IZakrosian-12/6/1997
10733 <i>Is this information out dated?</i> Its outdated in as much as iJonathan Bird-12/6/1997
10732 I got an "exact" definition of yield from APM's web-site. [I wasRational-12/6/1997
10731 Sankar - I'm referring to Pierre's notes on the questions addressed to Zakrosian-12/6/1997
10730 Zakrosian: <i> .. WDC's statement that they were having yield probleRational-12/6/1997
10729 Glenn: The APM announcement (Oct 23) also says: <i> The company is contiRational-12/6/1997
10728 Ken - I'm pretty sure your understanding of the meaning of yields is correcZakrosian-12/6/1997
10727 Hi Jon, <Is this a Typo? I didn't think that anybody is making 2.1 MB TDon Earl-12/6/1997
10726 <i>Are you SURE? I tend to disagree. The context of the statement stronglGlenn D. Rudolph-12/6/1997
10725 re: The word yield is indicating profit margins. Are you SURE? I tend to disagThink4Yourself-12/6/1997
10724 I can contribute to what is selling today... In Portland Ore, the low end machThink4Yourself-12/6/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News