SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
Waterhouse Securities
An SI Board Since June 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
2076 41 0
Emcee:  MRE Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1076 Yeah, it was cool! I had done a couple of hundred daytrades in Q4, and was expDan Swartzendruber-2/15/1999
1075 Yeah, you need to carefully verify the downloaded transactions before acceptingsnerd-2/15/1999
1074 I have had occasional weird behavior (I think it is quicken's fault, not waDan Swartzendruber-2/15/1999
1073 Works okay with Quicken. Snerd snerd-2/15/1999
1072 Anyone else have problems d/ling Waterhouse statement/transactions into MSFT MoMRE-2/15/1999
1071 TO: Is anyone know when Waterhouse is going to offer IPO stock? gomez.com JIMMY LIU-2/13/1999
1070 Anyone know of any plans to increase the timeout period on WebBroker? 5 minutessnerd-2/12/1999
1069 Check this out: mbtrading.com The gist of the notice is that the downtick ruleDan Swartzendruber-2/11/1999
1068 Dan: PMFJI, and I may be out of turn as I haven't followed the discussion NW_Trader-2/11/1999
1067 You may be right about the daytrader aspect... Dan Swartzendruber-2/11/1999
1066 It's within the rules to the best of my knowledge. I have two boxed positioMama Bear-2/11/1999
1065 Barb, isn't this against NASD regulations? I know of at least one online bDan Swartzendruber-2/11/1999
1064 To all: Does anyone know the margin requirement for naked put selling of WaterJoyce Chen-2/11/1999
1063 <i>(I bought $5000 worth of a less-than-$5 equity in my margin accomargin_man-2/11/1999
1062 Barb, Thanks for the explanation. My Buying Power goes back to reasonable amVincentTH-2/11/1999
1061 No naked shorts allowed at Waterhouse. The exercise is because Waterhouse insiMama Bear-2/11/1999
1060 <i>"would my short-sell order go into Pending state?</i>"Mama Bear-2/11/1999
1059 I assume that the account must be approved for naked short. Am I right? I rememmargin_man-2/10/1999
1058 Barb, I am impressed. The way I sell short is to aim a little lower than the VincentTH-2/10/1999
1057 Barb, I'm filled with awe and admiration of your ability. ----------------grok-2/10/1999
1056 <i>"Is there any reasonable way to short with WH?</i>" IMama Bear-2/10/1999
1055 MB, I am having the hardest time using WH to short stocks. First you have to cArt M-2/10/1999
1054 We don't need Big Brother. Sure, people can make big mistakes when they trLou Infeld-2/9/1999
1053 I agree, there are too many people that don't know what they're doing. bh-2/9/1999
1052 >What do others think of Waterhouse's restrictive policies? Makes good George Papadopoulos-2/9/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News