DOUBLE DAY, INC. (BB: DBDY) BIG GAINS LITTLE RISK

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks
DOUBLE DAY, INC. (BB: DBDY) BIG GAINS LITTLE RISK

An SI Board Since October 1996

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans	Symbol
2303	8	0	DBDY

Emcee: Darrell L. Peterson	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Market Data Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
1078	Richard, but 38 times .0098 does not get you very far, only $.38, that is a lon	Zeev Hed	-	6/28/1997
1077	Larry, ROFL, you always make me laugh, thanks. Yep, DBDY can do 38%.	Richard Mazzarella	-	6/28/1997
1076	Let's see, for DBDY to achieve a 38% growth rate from 96 to 97, what will t	Larry Brubaker	-	6/28/1997
1075	Zeev, 38 P/E is used for pharmaceuticals all the time even without growth, it&#	Richard Mazzarella	-	6/28/1997
1074	Richard: The magic 38 PE is reserved for agressive companies that have agressiv	Zeev Hed	-	6/28/1997
1073	Richard, I used 12 pe as worst case without high growth (i.e. 2 large plants	StocksR4Me	-	6/28/1997
1072	Larry, <<how did you happen to choose 38 as the fair value p/e?>> A	Richard Mazzarella	-	6/28/1997
1071	Richard: Of course, .15 is what they are saying the lower limit is. They also	Larry Brubaker	-	6/28/1997
1070	Chris, $0.15 seems to be the lower limit for earnings this year. Assuming that	Richard Mazzarella	-	6/28/1997
1069	Richard, thanks for bringing back Mark's post, note the stock violated 1.25	Zeev Hed	-	6/28/1997
1068	Zeev, technicals? OK, let's return to yesteryear where: exchange2000.com To	Richard Mazzarella	-	6/28/1997
1067	Richard, .15 per share for 1997 was my previous guess if Mon View/Miller are	StocksR4Me	-	6/27/1997
1066	Richard, when the "fundamentals" and the technicals do not jive, beli	Zeev Hed	-	6/27/1997
1065	Richard: You didn't ask me but I would guess the fundamental reason for th	Larry Brubaker	-	6/27/1997
1064	Zeev, <<a test of .875 in the next two weeks>> Such a cheery fellow	Richard Mazzarella	-	6/27/1997
1063	Richard, concerning the form 144 filings, I was not able to find the ones from	Mad_Mouse	-	6/27/1997
1062	Richard, we broke through eveybody Bollinger and resistance, I would not be sur	Zeev Hed	-	6/27/1997
1061	Thanks Josh for your post (especially your morbid curiosity). We all know what	Mad_Mouse	-	6/27/1997
1060	Josh, Thanks for your post. <<His answer was $0.15>> That should ha	Richard Mazzarella	-	6/27/1997
1059	I spoke to Mr. Stanek just now: 1. Currently, they have two banks interested i	Josh C. Pleasure, M.D.	-	6/27/1997
1058	Larry, <<Did you ask Lodick if he was planning on selling the company for	Richard Mazzarella	-	6/27/1997
1057	Arnold, Re: "We should see an announcement in the next week or so concerni	StocksR4Me	-	6/26/1997
1056	Here is a little info I got from the AOL boards on covol. Subj: Re:Covol shar	arnold silver	-	6/26/1997
1055	I just got of the phone with Mike Stanek. Most of the conversation has been hea	Colby	-	6/26/1997
1054	Larry, since Zeev convinced me that there wouldn't be a Reg S, and you that	Richard Mazzarella	-	6/26/1997

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):