Presstek -- Stock of the Decade?? | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks
Presstek -- Stock of the Decade??

An SI Board Since March 1996

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans	Symbol
11098	20	0	PRST

Emcee: SI (no user)	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Market Data Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
10798	Do you honestly believe one firm could have the rights to mounting a laser on a	Gary	-	5/29/1999
10797	Gary, You ask......."PRST and Creo both may have a place in the industry.	NEIL MACK	-	5/29/1999
10796	Neil, You have 89 pages to read,Creo and Heidelberg are working jontly on direc	Gary	-	5/28/1999
10795	Neil, why bother. He is clearly not going to make his own stand. He will simply	SG	-	5/28/1999
10794	James....I could not find any clear notation in the JV agreement between Heidel	NEIL MACK	-	5/28/1999
10793	Mad2, what they do is always the real litmus test, as you say. The near and m	SG	-	5/27/1999
10792	Scott, I have found that in the business world its much more important what peo	Mad2	-	5/27/1999
10791	Duh, Scott, I was actually being nice, asking for your impression. Neil didn&	James C. Shircliff	-	5/27/1999
10790	Gary, I have a basic understanding of patent laws but a method for doing someth	SG	-	5/27/1999
10789	Duh, where have you been for the last few days? Floating in the punch bowl? Wh	SG	-	5/27/1999
10788	I said PRST up until 6 months ago didn't have the best relationship. I will	Gary	-	5/27/1999
10787	Scott, I question how any firm could say they have a patent on mounting a lase	Gary	-	5/27/1999
10786	Dear Neil and Scott, Have you seen the CREO filings? I bet you have. That'	James C. Shircliff	-	5/27/1999
10785	Mad2, no question about it. I would not want PRST to piss-off any existing or f	SG	-	5/27/1999
10784	Scott, No company has advanced in a OEM equipment business by pissing off other	Mad2	-	5/27/1999
10783	Gary, these words from you say a mouth full, <<agreements between Creo an	SG	-	5/27/1999
10782	Firstly Neil I don't have the time or the inclination to post the	Gary	-	5/26/1999
10781	Dear Neil, Go to Partes/Free Edgar (The SEC docs for free!) Look for Creo's	James C. Shircliff	-	5/26/1999
10780	Gary.......Have read your posts.....please provide the site where I can researc	NEIL MACK	-	5/26/1999
10779	Dear Richard, Sorry about that. Every time I challenge Scott or Neil's ba	James C. Shircliff	-	5/26/1999
10778	This thread has deteriorated to the point of absurdity - it no longer holds an	scrooge	-	5/26/1999
10777	Dear SRVHAPless, The reason for only 5% research is that there is so little su	James C. Shircliff	-	5/26/1999
10776	SRVHAP, You are not helping the matter. It is with great comfort that I read t	SG	-	5/26/1999
10775	Why is it that this board seems to be 5% research and 95% name calling and atta	srvhap	-	5/26/1999
10774	Now now Scott..... whose calling who names? Your one of the few guys who only a	Mad2	-	5/25/1999

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):