SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Presstek -- Stock of the Decade??
An SI Board Since March 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
11098 20 0 PRST
Emcee:  SI (no user) Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
10848 Dear Count, Great to have you back! Flame away, I am still here! Are you stiJames C. Shircliff-6/19/1999
10847 Neil, thanks to you and Scott for staying with it and keeping all of us informekenneth j rabalais-6/19/1999
10846 Actually neither, Rory... one would have to be quite unbalanced to short this scount gold-6/19/1999
10845 I have confirmed that it was CREO that challenged the on-press imaging PresstekNEIL MACK-6/18/1999
10844 Brent, Its true, Creo is the one who requested a re-exam. <<by not allowSG-6/18/1999
10843 Thanks for those posts. I've never owned this stuff, but remember watchingRory Foster-6/18/1999
10842 If what you are saying is true (Creo asking for re-examination), I would say thBrent-6/18/1999
10841 Brent, this patent was re-examined by creo!!!! and Creo failed. I think you arSG-6/18/1999
10840 I must have. The only PR I saw was ... "Presstek Intellectual Property EBrent-6/18/1999
10839 Brent, you must have missed the dow jones newswire. Now would be a good time tSG-6/18/1999
10838 Brent, you must have missed the dow jones newsire. Now would be a good time toSG-6/18/1999
10837 Hey, SI is messed up. It reposted one of Neil's posts from 1996 again, butBrent-6/18/1999
10836 Goodnight Creo!!!!!!!!! eom SG-6/18/1999
10835 I am prefacing this post with the fact that all contents are my opinions and baNEIL MACK-6/18/1999
10834 I am writing this, as I have completed my investigation since the annual meetinNEIL MACK-6/18/1999
10833 Can we pronounce this thread, "Dead?" RIP SI-PRst Born: March 1996 DJames C. Shircliff-6/17/1999
10832 Dear Pierre, I haven't seen that either! Keep posting, it gets lonely oJames C. Shircliff-6/13/1999
10831 Presstek Shareholder Meeting - June 8, 1999 To All....... The Presstek annualNEIL MACK-6/10/1999
10830 Dan, the fact remains that there are no other direct image presses on the markeSG-6/9/1999
10829 Am I mistaken in that today was the Shareholder meeting. Did anyone go? The si90L43G6-6/9/1999
10828 I don't think that I have ever seen a company "applauding! Imploding ,Pierre Panet-Raymond-6/8/1999
10827 Mad2, I think this is the cornerstone you refer to. Abstract Printing apparatuSG-6/8/1999
10826 Scott, "the market for imprinted cans is as large as the can business itsBrent-6/8/1999
10825 Brent, I would guess that the market for imprinted cans is as large as the can SG-6/8/1999
10824 Scott, I think it is great this finally worked out for Presstek, but what are Brent-6/8/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News