SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Applied Magnetics Corp
An SI Board Since September 1995
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
12298 24 0 APM
Emcee:  Raymond Thomas Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
10873 I apologize your Longness. I didn't mean to disrupt your enjoyment of this Jonathan Bird-12/8/1997
10872 Jonathan (and everybody else) I know you have LOTS of problems with the CEO/CFJames Calladine-12/8/1997
10871 I have not heard or read about APM setting up a stock repurchase program. I knoThink4Yourself-12/8/1997
10870 Ken: It is also possible that the company will buy some shares, although they Rational-12/8/1997
10869 Jon: It is not standard unless the company requests to stop trading for some tRational-12/8/1997
10868 Halting after hours trading pending news is fairly standard. It protects us liThink4Yourself-12/8/1997
10867 Sankar, What does this mean? Is this standard procedure when news is released? Jonathan Bird-12/8/1997
10866 <b> Monday December 8, 6:20 pm Eastern Time NYSE Unavailables - NEW YORRational-12/8/1997
10865 Ken, you have been very meticulous in your posting, and have never strayed fromBrian Lempel-12/8/1997
10864 re: I want to point out that to those who believe APM cannot raise margins thaThink4Yourself-12/8/1997
10863 re: Shorts or Longs will bend the release to their liking. I respectfully disaThink4Yourself-12/8/1997
10862 >Assume no increase in R&D or SGA [probably conservative since they >DJ Levy-12/8/1997
10861 Mike, not to beat it to death, but here is the paragraph: <i>Net sales aBrian Lempel-12/8/1997
10860 OK, with the present estimates.Jonathan Bird-12/8/1997
10859 >>With the current earnings estimates on APM I believe we are at fair valYogi - Paul-12/8/1997
10858 <i>All I can say is that we will know who's right tomorrow.</i>Jonathan Bird-12/8/1997
10857 i would be wary about shorting. a little late to the party and will probably bvirgil vancleave-12/8/1997
10856 read it, and my interpretation is that the low yields refers to MR head productEyeDrMike-12/8/1997
10855 Jon, I appreciate your and everyone else's efforts on APM. However, I thinBrian Lempel-12/8/1997
10854 <i>BEST CASE SCENARIO BEFORE ONE-TIME CHARGES:</i> Thanks for thatJonathan Bird-12/8/1997
10853 Lets see- APM charge of 4.2 mill vs RDRT charge of 15 mill due to Micropolis Mark Adams-12/8/1997
10852 THE COLD HARD NUMBERS: ----------------------------- From qtr ended Sept 27, 1William T. Katz-12/8/1997
10851 Thank you Sankar. I am happy we are agreeing on something for once. I also wantJonathan Bird-12/8/1997
10850 I am very convinced that <i> there is more bad news to come.</i> SRational-12/8/1997
10849 Jon: <i> I know I am nitpicking this release.</i> I do not think Rational-12/8/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News