SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Presstek -- Stock of the Decade??
An SI Board Since March 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
11098 20 0 PRST
Emcee:  SI (no user) Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
10898 OFF TOPIC: "Fish or get off the pot"... "Sh*t or cut bait"count gold-7/18/1999
10897 PRST better put up or shut up. Look what I found on Heidi's web site July SG-7/16/1999
10896 This stock of the decade is running out of time! socrates-7/15/1999
10895 Madpinto, Neil is a real PRST rah, rah guy. PSRT is going to $200 again psychoGary-7/14/1999
10894 "Dot Print" states "CREO Infringement".......... In the fiNEIL MACK-7/14/1999
10893 It will be interesting to see the pricing. CREO has targeted the bigger printerGary-7/14/1999
10892 Olu, RE: <i>I have been waiting for 1 year for PRST to go down to $2 liGVTucker-7/14/1999
10891 Hi NEIL MACK; About those PRST press releases... Five press releases in five wBilow-7/14/1999
10890 While examining the CREO IPO prospectus, filed on Edgar 7-01-99, I found the foNEIL MACK-7/14/1999
10889 I'll be out of the country from this afternoon on, until July 24th, takingNEIL MACK-7/14/1999
10888 I have checked the CREO website for any response to the Presstek challenge. NoNEIL MACK-7/14/1999
10887 Gary, we learned that the new Presstek CTP platesetter (Pearlsetter-plus) will NEIL MACK-7/14/1999
10886 Paul A, (If you are still around) I have been waiting for 1 year for PRST to gOlu Emuleomo-7/13/1999
10885 If PRST have a good inexpensive pre press operation, Great.That would involve sGary-7/13/1999
10884 Gary, I agree....that is what makes the projects Presstek is now working on mosNEIL MACK-7/13/1999
10883 There is a lot of bantering going on but I for one agree that the sale of QM woGary-7/13/1999
10882 Jim, Before you leave us, as it seems clear that you AGAIN choose to interpret NEIL MACK-7/13/1999
10881 Dear Neil, I really do get a kick out of your <<Jimmy my boy>> resJames C. Shircliff-7/12/1999
10880 All kidding aside, I have reread this post and have gleaned some powerful insigJames C. Shircliff-7/12/1999
10879 Jim, I answered your questions spending considerable time to hopefully educate NEIL MACK-7/10/1999
10878 Neil, As I've said before, I hope you make all your money back with PRST.Gary-7/10/1999
10877 Dear Neil, Well you win this debate point in your mind from your perspective. James C. Shircliff-7/10/1999
10876 Jim....From Yahoo message board, you ask....."What is the breakeven time oNEIL MACK-7/9/1999
10875 In answer to a request, the following information is provided to show the actuaNEIL MACK-7/8/1999
10874 Gary, do you mean another challenge by CREO of the same on-press patent that waNEIL MACK-7/8/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):