SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
Advanced Micro Devices - Off Topic
An SI Board Since June 2002
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
1141 14 0
Emcee:  jjayxxxx Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1091Whichever is easiest to implement, which IMO is a calendar day. JoeJoe NYC-8/28/2007
1090You do realize, of course, that if it were for you posting on how to kick peopleThe Duke of URL©-8/27/2007
1089I'm fairly certain it was the reason. Just look at the context surrounding tdougSF30-8/27/2007
1088"Because it is shameful, obviously." Not quite as shameful as it woulcombjelly-8/27/2007
1087"i think you have too much to do." Heh. Good catch. I was positive thcombjelly-8/27/2007
1086<i>The vote will run for 48 [sic] from the posting time.</i> i thinmuzosi-8/27/2007
1085Because it is shameful, obviously.dougSF30-8/27/2007
1084It has been proposed to lift the speed limit rule. If you vote to keep the rule,combjelly-8/27/2007
1083It has been proposed to lift the speed limit rule. If you vote to repeal the rulcombjelly-8/27/2007
1082"You don't think they'd actually STATE that as their reason, do youcombjelly-8/27/2007
1081You seem to want to pick a fight. Not interested.dougSF30-8/26/2007
1080i see that you're taking my advice. keep it up & do stay out of the modemuzosi-8/26/2007
1079<i>You don't think they'd actually STATE that as their reason, do muzosi-8/26/2007
1078Well something is certainly an indication of someone's stupidity, you got thdougSF30-8/26/2007
1077You don't think they'd actually STATE that as their reason, do you?dougSF30-8/26/2007
1076<i>After all, that's why the majority of them voted for it.</i> muzosi-8/26/2007
1075" After all, that's why the majority of them voted for it." Don&#combjelly-8/26/2007
1074Well why don't you explain to the group that it hasn't caused their precdougSF30-8/26/2007
1073It's a stupid rule, because the unthreaded board often functions like a &quodougSF30-8/26/2007
1072greg, I would respond to you but I am afraid I might be posting too much for theThe Duke of URL©-8/26/2007
1071re: <i>Right or wrong, good or bad, the group voted on it and chose it.<greg s-8/25/2007
1070"The simple fact that it takes so much effort to enforce should give you a combjelly-8/25/2007
1069re: <i>speed limit</i> An idiotic rule, IMO. The simple fact that greg s-8/25/2007
1068It is a fantastic rule. 80 posts in 24 hours is excessive. It reveals a very uFJB-8/25/2007
1067CJ, Re: Frankly, I would like to lift the permanent bans we have, although thereTGPTNDR-8/25/2007
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News