SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA)
An SI Board Since January 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2646 270 0 NVDA
Emcee:  Frank Sully Type:  Moderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1096Reaction to this preannouncement has be particularly severe. It seems that a loTechieGuy-alt-8/3/2002
1095Donny, don't kid yourself. Those were mostly traders who mostly got in and Dave Gore-8/1/2002
1094Look at this chart (picked up from yahoo poster) and see the similarities +/- 14SBHX-8/1/2002
1093nvidiot shareholders have no one to blame but themselves for chasing this pig inBrasco One-7/31/2002
1092BWAC/ALL --- You have to expect a class action lawsuit soon. Just be aware thatDave Gore-7/31/2002
1091Briefing comments on NVDA ---- a good read; lack of trust now cited Message 178Dave Gore-7/31/2002
1090Andreas you can never fully trust anyone. All you can do is trade on the fundamRon Dior-7/31/2002
1089Ron, why do you still believe NVDA's management after they have lied for monandreas_wonisch-7/31/2002
1088Rion, <i>The company said it's cautious about the overall market in tJoe NYC-7/31/2002
1087By TSC Staff 07/30/2002 06:03 PM EDT Video card giant Nvidia (NVDA:Nasdaq - nRon Dior-7/31/2002
1086Ron, Re: <I>If the market comes back then the consumer will come back for andreas_wonisch-7/31/2002
1085<i>that's a 25% revenue miss in one quarter. What's a huge miss toRon Dior-7/31/2002
1084Trashing a stock by BARRON'S is not uncommon, especially when the company reArt Bechhoefer-7/31/2002
1083$11.56 - Ouch...condolences to the longs here, but remember...when you're crrobbie-7/31/2002
1082Robbie, <Revenues don't mean anything here IMO...GROWTH GOING FORWARD ANDBWAC-7/31/2002
1081Revenues don't mean anything here IMO...GROWTH GOING FORWARD AND PROFITS R Wrobbie-7/31/2002
1080If you bothered to read what I was referring to first maybe it wouldn't be sBWAC-7/31/2002
1079Robbie, Re: <I>Expect all the normal shareholder suits after this ugly, anandreas_wonisch-7/31/2002
1078Ron, Re: <I>[Revenue from $567 to $410-430] This in itself is not a huge mandreas_wonisch-7/31/2002
1077"but can deduct only $3,000 per year of losses" Steve, I hear ya, butRutgers-7/31/2002
1076<i>And BTW, another unfairness is the fact that you have to pay cap. gain Artslaw-7/31/2002
1075<i>Well the last comparable revenue quarter might be 3Q ended October 28, robbie-7/31/2002
1074wbmw, The max loss you can deduct from your taxes is $3,000 per year if you areJoe NYC-7/31/2002
1073Ron, Re: <i>"Unless this is a pack of lies I say the stock will head wanna_bmw-7/31/2002
1072<i>So without the inventory writeoff earnings could possibly be in the 20 Ron Dior-7/30/2002
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News