SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Sycamore Networks Inc-(SCMR)
An SI Board Since August 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2249 118 0 SCMR
Emcee:  Mohan Marette Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1099 **OT** Economy: Jan Factory orders revised Friday, March 3 11:00 PM SGT U.S.Mohan Marette-3/3/2000
1098 The stock price will be sustainable if Sycamore continues to rope in customers Mohan Marette-3/3/2000
1097 John, That article is the basis of my last statement. BrianTechplayer-3/3/2000
1096 TWST Communications Equipment Report in Robertson Stephens Technology 2000 SpecJohn F.-3/3/2000
1095 e-Bill, Of those 3, CSCO. CSCO is not in the top 3 now. Perhaps Ciena loses oTechplayer-3/3/2000
1094 Saw it in my driveway this morning. :-) Forester says SCMR will be one of theBill-3/3/2000
1093 Article to consider....BOSTON CAPITAL For some, Sycamore's stock too hot toTechplayer-3/3/2000
1092 <i>No point in comparing Sycamore to Nortel or to Lucent or anybody like Craig Richards-3/3/2000
1091 JBW ... KUDO's for the excellent informative post. THX GardenerMrGardener-3/3/2000
1090 <i>Nortel, on the other hand, controls 40+% of the SONET market. What hapCraig Richards-3/3/2000
1089 Great news!!!Bill-3/3/2000
1088 INSTANT VIEW - Feb job report -> 'To the moon Alice'. Feb. jobs repMohan Marette-3/3/2000
1087 One more point on this topic. It is clear that SCMR management wants to build aBill-3/3/2000
1086 After looking at Nortel's numbers I am not about go 'ga-ga' over thMohan Marette-3/2/2000
1085 You know what? You are exactly right! On the other hand, think about what theJohn B. Williams-3/2/2000
1084 <i>190x148=$28B.</i> My mistake; there are <b>2</b>36 Craig Richards-3/2/2000
1083 Every buyer out there is saying what they once said about the Alamo: "RemeBill Holtzman-3/2/2000
1082 190x148=$28B.Bill-3/2/2000
1081 <i>I am of the opinion that investors are willing to pay a premium for hyCraig Richards-3/2/2000
1080 From The Boston Globe: NEW STOCK PROVES WORTH: Chalk up another win for the newJames Lee Baldwin-3/2/2000
1079 Your post sounds the same as the one on RB. James Lee Baldwin-3/2/2000
1078 Well may be so but I am not about to complain. You may also want to look at futMohan Marette-3/2/2000
1077 This is ridiculous! SCMR is going up based on momentum, a low float, and huge Craig Richards-3/2/2000
1076 Best of luck. If the revenue projections form SSB is any indication of things tMohan Marette-3/2/2000
1075 Took the plunge today. Here's to the future.John B. Williams-3/1/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News