SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends
Picks, Pokes, Pigs, Porks & The Penis Envy Trade of the Day!
An SI Board Since December 2000
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
111 3 0
Emcee:  Stoctrash Type:  Moderated
Introduction Compact
 Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
11I think any retest of that 58-60 QQQ level could be bought...IF no Big Guns warnStoctrash-12/2/2000
10Ya know.........I think the qqq represent good potential if we can get past thisAugustus Gloop-12/2/2000
9I think not sprinkler........LMAOAugustus Gloop-12/2/2000
8he's history....Stoctrash-12/2/2000
7LMAOAugustus Gloop-12/2/2000
6<I> .....if you don't change your tune</I> You talking about myDoppler-12/2/2000
5My son...that is no Poke, that is major wood from a PIG.Stoctrash-12/2/2000
4ummmm,,, I think you're outta here pal if you don't change your tune!Stoctrash-12/2/2000
3Smithee's Poke NTAP Short at 145 on 10/19/2000. Cover today at 51. Mmmmm Alan Smithee-12/2/2000
2I don't like this thread. The moderator seems like a pedantic buffoon. For Doppler-12/2/2000
1<<btw...I'll try to trade the QQQ both ways too.>> We always knAugustus Gloop-12/2/2000
 Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News