Employee Stock Options - NQSOs & ISOs | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends
Employee Stock Options - NQSOs & ISOs

An SI Board Since June 2002

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans
786	22	0

Emcee: rkral	Type: Moderated

Introduction Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Posted
11	Uncle, Just as bad is having a ton of employee stock options, like my wife, but	jazzcat2000	6/10/2002
10	<i>The answer is 722M/(1-tax rate)</i> You're right .. again! W	rkral	6/10/2002
9	Ron, I just stopped by to wish you success with your new discussion forum. My o	Uncle Frank	6/10/2002
8	<i>Unless I've gone totally crackers, I believe you were correct the f	hueyone	6/10/2002
7	But even though I think you have gone crackers<gg>, I will try to add some	hueyone	6/10/2002
6	<i>Unless I've gone totally crackers</i> By George, I think you	hueyone	6/10/2002
5	<i>My thought is that corporations will want to continue to get the cash f	rkral	6/10/2002
4	To hueyone in reply to Message 17580004 <i>If the pro forma number given	rkral	6/10/2002
3	On a related matter, since the Levin/McCain bill does not specify what method is	hueyone	6/10/2002
2	Hi Ron: Here are my thoughts on how corporations would implement the Levin/McCa	hueyone	6/10/2002
1	Here is link to the Levin/McCain proposal regarding employee stock options: lev	hueyone	6/10/2002

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):