Waterhouse Securities | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech
Waterhouse Securities

An SI Board Since June 1997

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans
2076	41	0

Emcee: MRE	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
1101	Yes, I saw this article. Steve is extremely savvy. If his interpretation is t	Dan Swartzendruber	-	2/16/1999
1100	Dan, with further information, I think that I may be too sanguine about relying	Mama Bear	-	2/16/1999
1099	Today I have been getting a "No result code" message over and over ag	aroundight	-	2/16/1999
1098	Okay, thanks for the clarification. They certainly make this more than confusi	Dan Swartzendruber	-	2/16/1999
1097	<i>"except that I don't know why you must open another browser w	Mama Bear	-	2/16/1999
1096	<i>"Does it also work if I establish the long position first?</i&	Mama Bear	-	2/16/1999
1095	//V: Yes, but as noted in another post today, such a sequence (long then short	NW_Trader	-	2/16/1999
1094	Pat, Thanks for the reply. So, I can box my long position by submitting a se	VincentTH	-	2/16/1999
1093	VTH: That's the idea, as I have done it, except that I don't know why	NW_Trader	-	2/16/1999
1092	Barb, I remembered it now. Does it also work if I establish the long position	VincentTH	-	2/16/1999
1091	Dan, I read that publication from NASDR. It is perfectly legal to enter into	VincentTH	-	2/16/1999
1090	"Another benefit of having a boxed position is being able to 'short	Dave Hanson	-	2/16/1999
1089	Dan, my comment is that I think that there are different rules for 'daytrad	Mama Bear	-	2/16/1999
1088	<i>The idea is not to circumvent the short sale approval, but to neutrali	Dan Swartzendruber	-	2/16/1999
1087	<i>"but I remember reading somewhere that a box position must be ent	Mama Bear	-	2/16/1999
1086	Barb and Dave, I re-read Barb's note for the nth time, and I believe I no	VincentTH	-	2/16/1999
1085	Dave... <apologize for the confused read on my part> Man, ya'll have	snerd	-	2/16/1999
1084	Thanks Barb. I re-read your post, and see that I misunderstood. I now see th	Dave Hanson	-	2/16/1999
1083	Gary, I believe this is a holdover from the days when shorting against the box	Mama Bear	-	2/15/1999
1082	<i>"Did you mean this,</i>" Dave, the object of that exe	Mama Bear	-	2/15/1999
1081	<i>I too have a question about your clever technique of avoiding short s	Dan Swartzendruber	-	2/15/1999
1080	I too have a question about your clever technique of avoiding short sale approv	Gary Smith	-	2/15/1999
1079	"fill in a buy order for the stock" Barb, Did you mean this, or fil	Dave Hanson	-	2/15/1999
1078	I've been downloading into Quicken Deluxe for more than a year and have had	bh	-	2/15/1999
1077	Another problem I've seen a couple of times was liquidation of money market	Dan Swartzendruber	-	2/15/1999

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):