SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Presstek -- Stock of the Decade??
An SI Board Since March 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
11098 20 0 PRST
Emcee:  SI (no user) Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
11023 Mad, this patent has me scratching my head. It seems to be the most basic of baSG-12/8/1999
11022 I guess from today's performance that would be good news (although I canMadpinto-12/8/1999
11021 Yes sir eomSG-12/8/1999
11020 They're really running PRST today,Just think what would happen to CREO if RMMOYER-12/8/1999
11019 United States Patent 5,996,496 Lewis, et. al. Dec. 7, 1999 ----------------SG-12/8/1999
11018 You expect this stock to move on facts? <eom>George T. Santamaria-12/8/1999
11017 I guess we don't want to jinx it! Madpinto-12/7/1999
11016 What's going on? We hit a 52 week high and nobody is saying anything.NOXQUSE-12/7/1999
11015 Thanks Scott, the market seems to agree with you! Madpinto-12/3/1999
11014 Madpinto, I can only notice the volume of press manufacturers that are partnereSG-12/3/1999
11013 I'm curious why you are so confident that "2,3 & 4 are a lock"Madpinto-12/3/1999
11012 2,3 & 4 are a lock. 1 & 5 are not likely. Looks like you won't evSG-12/2/1999
11011 Gosh, I never have thought about going long PRST, but off the top of my head, hGVTucker-12/2/1999
11010 GV, what would it take for you to go long in PRST. I know you understand this SG-12/2/1999
11009 Scott, RE: <i>Like I said, the idea that PRST is turning around is counGVTucker-12/1/1999
11008 Looking forward, Mr. Rossen indicated that we expect to approach breakeven in tSG-12/1/1999
11007 Nice try GV, you almost had me with this line of non-emotion BS, <<EmotioSG-12/1/1999
11006 Scott, RE: <i>Why would a long exit after a favorable patent resolutionGVTucker-11/30/1999
11005 Gv, Your subjectivity is showing through. You say, <<If I were long, a paSG-11/30/1999
11004 NEIL, RE: <I>What specifics did current Presstek management state/do, tGVTucker-11/30/1999
11003 GV....Thanks for your response. I would like to point out the following: In yNEIL MACK-11/29/1999
11002 NEIL, just a little clarification. <i>Point here is Merrill Lynch's GVTucker-11/29/1999
11001 Just love all those facts you always preach about Neil!! Just jabber! When CreGary-11/25/1999
11000 GV......In the statement: "Creo believes that its approach is significantNEIL MACK-11/24/1999
10999 GV.......Creo's "beliefs" are not pertinent to the point of my poNEIL MACK-11/24/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):