SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy
American International Petroleum Corp
An SI Board Since August 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
11888 24 0 AIPN
Emcee:  Alan J. Levie Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
11063 Taylor, the change of heart is AIPN's, new lows beget new lows. Zeev Zeev Hed-10/20/1999
11062 dRriSK "...Taylor you are a disingenuous slob! .." What kind of talTaylor Mill-10/20/1999
11061 Taylor you are a disingenuous slob! Naked shorts. jacobkeith 10/19/1999 08DRRISK-10/19/1999
11060 DOC we miss you. From the clubhouse DODGE UPDATE? Taylor Mill-10/19/1999
11059 Wait a minute! The current 1999 hurricane season, with it's massive floodinJordan Electron-10/17/1999
11058 Hurricane ?? Foxy, you must be posting on the wrong board for a while !! This Lex Kroes-10/17/1999
11057 Another Hurricane Update: newswire.ca As Deer Hunter was faithful to completeFoxyLoxy-10/16/1999
11056 Hurricane Hydrocarbons Update Deal with refiner inked, but Bondholders petitioFoxyLoxy-10/14/1999
11055 Ray " If instead, they asked for or are simply going to accept some sort Taylor Mill-10/13/1999
11054 Ray The debate certainly has value and you represent your viewpoint well. YouTaylor Mill-10/13/1999
11053 best time to buy a stock is when nobody wants it, looks like its been time to bmrvn t. martian-10/12/1999
11052 Razor, I do not know exactly what you mean by "analysts", but I assumRay-10/12/1999
11051 Probabilities for Economic Recovery Ray: Typically analysts use 90% probabilitRazorbak-10/12/1999
11050 Our discussion re the Shag-Shom gas is, I think, helping to clarify what the RRay-10/12/1999
11049 Ray "I do understand the distinctions between "proven" and &quoTaylor Mill-10/12/1999
11048 Taylor-et-al assumes incorrectly again and again. You note that I said: "Ray-10/12/1999
11047 Ray "IMO your post 11040 shows essentially the same incorrect reasoning aTaylor Mill-10/11/1999
11046 Ray I think it is becoming more and more clear that you are misinterpreting whTaylor Mill-10/11/1999
11045 Foxy: ""So, if I understand your view, you assume that a "10-20%Ray-10/11/1999
11044 Taylor-et-al, IMO your post 11040 shows essentially the same incorrect reasoninRay-10/11/1999
11043 Taylor-et-al (TEA), you have introduced so many distortions, poor assumptions, Ray-10/11/1999
11042 Ray Thank you for your response. I am sorry if you thought I was seeking clarFoxyLoxy-10/11/1999
11041 Ray Regarding a post from Ray on Yahoo "I did in fact take time to do thTaylor Mill-10/10/1999
11040 Ray "There is that zany assumption of only 449 bcf from Shag again. FurthTaylor Mill-10/10/1999
11039 Ray Your viewpoint regarding the financing is well taken; yes, it may have beeTaylor Mill-10/10/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News