SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy
Petrokazakhstan Inc.
An SI Board Since March 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2357 10 0 PKN
Emcee:  kingfisher Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1107 Forecaster Whew, you seem to have some funny attitude going there. I do not knFoxyLoxy-6/8/2000
1106 ROFLMAO. Stick with your numerical analysis, forecaster. At least there you do Razorbak-6/8/2000
1105 Foxy, you sound definitely like Hickory's clone. Perhaps you have identicalforecaster-6/8/2000
1104 Hello. Thought I would drop a line and see how things were going. A little bumFoxyLoxy-6/7/2000
1103 2000 First Quarter Interim Report - OUTLOOK. Just received by mail a copy of tforecaster-6/6/2000
1102 Tellengarten. Any new issue of shares by ShNOS would have to be passed by the forecaster-6/6/2000
1101 TeeVee, US$ 25??? <b>Yes!</b> In fact, that is what I told my bHickory-6/4/2000
1100 Forecaster, You are great at reading between the lines---reading what you wantHickory-6/4/2000
1099 Hickory, <b>Would mgmt's refraining from making the investment commuteevee-6/4/2000
1098 Cooliemon, Would mgmt's refraining from making the investment community awHickory-6/4/2000
1097 Hickory: I can't help but to admire your skilled, resourceful and inventivforecaster-6/4/2000
1096 Tellengarten: I am not offended, thanks for your great info. Let me digest it forecaster-6/4/2000
1095 Coolie, I tracked down Tellengarten's(Yahoo) comment about a new issue at Sforecaster-6/4/2000
1094 forecaster: i believe what the writer was referring to was the total # shares cooliemon-6/4/2000
1093 There were also references on the Yahoo thread about "not so correct"forecaster-6/3/2000
1092 rest of list: ompany Filercooliemon-6/3/2000
1091 more of list: RESEARCH TOOLS HELP cooliemon-6/3/2000
1090 hickory: it seems the boys on yahoo are in the mood of badmouthing the SI tecooliemon-6/3/2000
1089 hickory: "The only rationale I can think of is that Bernard and his friencooliemon-6/2/2000
1088 Doesn't it seem a bit odd, that with the solid turn-around performance and Hickory-6/2/2000
1087 Dean, the P/E ratio is more a question of psychology than economics. I do not forecaster-6/1/2000
1086 Dean, earnings/share will depend on the number of shares. I calculated Q1 earnforecaster-6/1/2000
1085 According to your estimates, that would equate to yearly earning of .55 x 4 or Dean O'Dell-5/31/2000
1084 Forecaster, thanks for that analysis. Confirms my less technical instincts thatThomas Kelly-5/31/2000
1083 Tom, here is my analysis of Q1 financial results. 1. I consider the non-integrforecaster-5/31/2000
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):