SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
ATC Communications ATCT
An SI Board Since June 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2636 4 0 ATCT
Emcee:  SI (no user) Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
111 Geoff, I wouldn't get too worked up over all this price movement. It doesn&Zeus549-11/4/1996
110 test! schwab.comJerry Zhou-11/3/1996
109 Somehow, I suspect, that some hyped penny-stock does not make as good a compariGeoff Trachtenberg-11/3/1996
108 >"that chart reminds me that there is always a buyer for every seller.&Just4fun2-11/3/1996
107 Intersting review of ATCT situation on Motley Fool fool.comDavid Loomis-11/3/1996
106 K.H., Bill & Randy Thanks for info DennisDennis J Baltz-11/2/1996
105 Mite consider Tradestar,express acct.,$28 up to 5000 shrs.,options;$28 min.plusSR/WA-11/2/1996
104 Dennis, I use ESchwab on my Mac using the internet. Cost is $29.95. You simplyBill Petersen-11/2/1996
103 Dennis - I go through Ceres Securities which charges $18 flat rate. They are Randy Tidd-11/2/1996
102 When I bought 400 shares of ATCT chuck schwab charged me $97.78 even though I bDennis J Baltz-11/2/1996
101 That chart reminds me that there is always a buyer for every seller, even afterDavid Loomis-11/1/1996
100 ALL: Check out this graph of OCTL which also had a big drop recently. techstoGeoff Trachtenberg-11/1/1996
99 Oppenhiemer reiterated their BUY today and raised year-end revenues for 1997 upGeoff Trachtenberg-11/1/1996
98 My point was don't come back with the "lofty p/e" argument--whichGeoff Trachtenberg-11/1/1996
97 Just because I post in those forums does not mean I invest in those stocks. I tfedhead-11/1/1996
96 13? 13? 13!! You seriously see this stock losing MORE than 50% of it's valGeoff Trachtenberg-11/1/1996
95 There was insider buying to the tune of millions of bucks at 13 and change so fedhead-11/1/1996
94 Lucky you! I think the MM's had a really nice day chasing the "FOOLS&jeff c.-11/1/1996
93 >>Just the opposite of a short squeeze on a breakout. If that's trueGeoff Trachtenberg-11/1/1996
92 Marie Of course there are short term traders. Is there something inherently eviZeus549-11/1/1996
91 marie, Like many making comments on this thread I'm in at around 23-3/4. Just4fun2-11/1/1996
90 Lee - are you saying that there aren't any short-term traders around tryingMarie Thorsson-11/1/1996
89 Geoff, He didn't say he was shorting the stock. IMHO it does look from a teZeus549-11/1/1996
88 Dennis, I am a *buyer* at 17 5/8. Stay long!!!Geoff Trachtenberg-11/1/1996
87 I'm in with 400 shares @24 and suffering. I know it is bad form to buy a stDennis J Baltz-11/1/1996
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News