SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
Trading IOMEGA based on technical analysis
An SI Board Since August 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1511 12 0 IOM
Emcee:  Elliot Brenner Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1111 Robert and/or Jon: Any commentary from the TA front on today's action?KM-8/15/1997
1110 No, there is no flaw in your argument. Since we do have a nice uptrend here, cAjit Abhyankar-8/13/1997
1109 Senthil, Exactly how is stock price affected by put/call ratio. Has to be gooGregory Cole Brock-8/13/1997
1108 A question in just the opposite direction: You say there are 3.2 Mil shares inSenthil Sankarappan-8/13/1997
1107 Most technical analysis will probably be useless for the next couple of days, hAjit Abhyankar-8/13/1997
1106 All, It's a real battle out there. I see some technicals pointing down buTriluminary-8/13/1997
1105 I don't really have a target of 28, I'm looking more at a range of 25 -Robert J. Partridge-8/13/1997
1104 Jon/Robert: Do either of you use Elliott Wave? That's the one we like bestKM-8/13/1997
1103 Positive crossover on the MACD/RSI on daily bars around 2:20 - somewhat tentatiJon Tara-8/13/1997
1102 Jon, I agree with Trufflette, you give good TA. I'm looking at today'sRobert J. Partridge-8/13/1997
1101 Jon, Again, thanks. I really appreciate your posts. BTW, did you see my post KM-8/13/1997
1100 IOM crossed over to the downside on my MACD/RSI indicator on one-hour bars yestJon Tara-8/13/1997
1099 Jon: Would you post your moves/impressions on this one like you did in June untKM-8/13/1997
1098 I suppose one should also have the market on your side. :( Can anyone else conJon Tara-8/13/1997
1097 To All, Free IOM technical analysis from Stock Smart: stocksmart.com WFSW.F. Schwertley-8/13/1997
1096 Robert: All previous BS aside, that is an impressive analysis. I will also beKM-8/12/1997
1095 Very powerful tool! <I plot two moving averages of different periods (which,Robert J. Partridge-8/12/1997
1094 Darrell, I do not pay much attention to straight MACD. I plot two moving averaJon Tara-8/12/1997
1093 not sure from your explanation the exact method you're using, but the weeklD.J.Smyth-8/12/1997
1092 didn't think you used oscillation Jon - MACD, that is.D.J.Smyth-8/12/1997
1091 See my post on the "non TA" IOM thread. I rely a great deal on a comJon Tara-8/12/1997
1090 Darrell, I agreee to some extent that 26 is an old resistance point but I thinGregory Cole Brock-8/11/1997
1089 obviously, $26, is the old resistance point on the NASDQ, but given that this iD.J.Smyth-8/11/1997
1088 Re:>> Just For Fun<< Click on the "Trader Coin " for JHerb Fuller-8/7/1997
1087 fyi -- fwiw -- ( and just for fun) itlnet.comjwk-8/7/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News