SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
INTEL FOR TECHNICIANS
An SI Board Since December 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1513 9 0 INTC
Emcee:  jmac Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1113 Hi PJ, As sincere as I can be in wanting to help you, please understand that SteelBlueIce-5/13/1997
1112 He stated he is in Intel for the longhaul. Selling in the 160s would have beenjmac-5/13/1997
1111 I am a trader. But, I have promised myself that I would lave my Intel alone. jmac-5/13/1997
1110 I appreciate your feedback.jmac-5/13/1997
1109 Jerry, I should have added 150 as a support level. It was the breakout area. Jim Cash-5/13/1997
1108 jmac, I agree with you if 147 is the bottom. The interesting part about this Jim Cash-5/13/1997
1107 <<<You may miss the re-entry or it may simply not be there @ 147. >JPR-5/13/1997
1106 Thanks jmac. One thing I've noticed about you: you don't fool around,Nuni-5/13/1997
1105 Don't become a day trader. For the four or five point differential, its nojmac-5/13/1997
1104 <<<<I think we could get oversold by the end of the week, hopJPR-5/13/1997
1103 John, I agree with 147 - 150 or should I say I hope -vbg-. Thomas said 150 - SteelBlueIce-5/13/1997
1102 Hi Jim, Nice to see your comments on the board. I think we could get oversold SteelBlueIce-5/13/1997
1101 Bill and others, Sorry the link did not work. I was busy trading and did not rRoad Walker-5/13/1997
1100 Correct me if I am wrong, but this is pretty serious technical damage, no?Bill March-5/13/1997
1099 Thank You, Jim. I was waiting for someone to say something about that. I don&PrettyBoy-5/13/1997
1098 My two cents... It is very important that we hold over 155 today which is theJim Cash-5/13/1997
1097 >> THIS WILL [sic] [may?] RESULT IN BILLIONS OF DAMAGES << SpeculaBill March-5/13/1997
1096 "Did Intel create similar technology/capabilities on their own?" AGreg Jung-5/13/1997
1095 Thread,TECH INPUT NEEDED John's comments techstocks.com are important. IQtrlytrades-5/13/1997
1094 John: Can't link your site. You better post what's saying in the news. nan-xiang chen-5/13/1997
1093 Especially if the link does not work. It's okay, lawsuits are SOP in tech Bill March-5/13/1997
1092 All, following may cause problems today and forward: biz.yahoo.com JohnRoad Walker-5/13/1997
1091 I saw a channel chart--can't remember where. But, we broke through the topjmac-5/12/1997
1090 Amazingly non-volatile for INTC today. I don't think we can get to 170 thijmac-5/12/1997
1089 jmac, 160 is the number of the moment. Consecutitive closes above Tues and WeSteelBlueIce-5/12/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News