E-Mini Pit | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends
E-Mini Pit

An SI Board Since January 2002

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans
11288	150	0

Emcee: the-phoenix	Type: Moderated

Introduction Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
11238	Exactly. f of s. eom	otherbrotherdaryl	-	5/9/2006
11237	<i> f of s.</i> There you go again! repeating yourself. That was th	Don Green	-	5/5/2006
11236	Now that I have re-read your posts, I can safely say you are full of shit. If a	otherbrotherdaryl	-	5/5/2006
11235	Ya lost me. I have posted here and SRAM, saying little, if anything, and nothin	otherbrotherdaryl	-	5/5/2006
11234	There is no probably about it and since it only occurred a few mins ago, I reall	Don Green	-	5/5/2006
11233	Well, then...... I probably did it. And like most any other time, I cannot rem	otherbrotherdaryl	-	5/5/2006
11232	I think in most languages it would considered obscene!	Don Green	-	5/5/2006
11231	Which earlier comments? Was I sane, dressed, or awake? Do you trade mini's	otherbrotherdaryl	-	5/5/2006
11230	otherbrotherdaryl That was quite an edit job from your earlier comments???	Don Green	-	5/5/2006
11229	I am always interested, but not in spam. What are you offerring? Being you are	otherbrotherdaryl	-	5/5/2006
11228	New ES setup with Snare Pole.......... img106.imageshack.us Click on chart to	otherbrotherdaryl	-	2/20/2006
11227	Yep. I did go long with the ES. After a day or so of nail biting I reverted ba	otherbrotherdaryl	-	2/3/2006
11226	Hey Daryl, or whatever your name is, I thought you said you went long ES at 1277	the-phoenix	-	2/2/2006
11225	Tick, tick, tick........ NQ working true img143.imageshack.us Have long since	otherbrotherdaryl	-	2/2/2006
11224	OT: New worm.... I thought it important to post because of the monniker "C	otherbrotherdaryl	-	2/2/2006
11223	ES dilemma......... img72.imageshack.us The first setup is still intact, in th	otherbrotherdaryl	-	1/28/2006
11222	I included only red in anticipation of the general trend to continue downward.	otherbrotherdaryl	-	1/27/2006
11221	red should be at 1680 eom	otherbrotherdaryl	-	1/25/2006
11220	img87.imageshack.us	otherbrotherdaryl	-	1/25/2006
11219	1732.50 is the 60 minute elevation of which the signal was given as marked in re	otherbrotherdaryl	-	1/22/2006
11218	Hi: While I like this method, I would have to quibble over your entry point on t	the-phoenix	-	1/22/2006
11217	Snare Pole continued........ Click on charts to enlarge. img516.imageshack.us	otherbrotherdaryl	-	1/22/2006
11216	Nothing is perfect. A similar method of mine, Inside-Out, has more rules than S	otherbrotherdaryl	-	1/18/2006
11215	Thanks, I get it now. Looks like a potentially good method to keep you in a tren	the-phoenix	-	1/18/2006
11214	I am sure someone somewhere has discovered this incredibly simple concept, but I	otherbrotherdaryl	-	1/18/2006

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):