SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Applied Magnetics Corp
An SI Board Since September 1995
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
12298 24 0 APM
Emcee:  Raymond Thomas Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
11273 >I think you underscored my point ole boy. Of course I did. But I'm alsFrodo Baxter-1/19/1998
11272 Thanks, folks, for the responses to my question. Sorry not to have got back soSpots-1/18/1998
11271 Donald, It seems we have had a similar interest in APM for the same length of tSteve Pick-1/18/1998
11270 Stitch, or more recently, PMAT (now TRKN) buying Electrotech and going broke inZeev Hed-1/18/1998
11269 Ahhh Lawrence; <i><<Buying APM for entry into the heads business mStitch-1/18/1998
11268 << Is this really a company anyone would want to own?>> It's a Bald Eagle-1/18/1998
11267 >>Buying APM for entry into the heads business makes about as much sense AlienTech-1/18/1998
11266 >I have sold worse off companies. Then I sure as hell hope they don't hFrodo Baxter-1/17/1998
11265 Lawrence; Foundrys. People. Hitachi has long coveted a position in the head buStitch-1/17/1998
11264 I think that WDC would buy them for the intellectual property, ie, the brains oBrian Lempel-1/17/1998
11263 What does APM have that WDC, IBM or Hitachi could possibly want? Headache? DebtFrodo Baxter-1/17/1998
11262 Greg; <i><<One possibility would be a buy-out by WDC or IBM - thatStitch-1/17/1998
11261 Jon, Good morning from Kuala Lumpur. You said: <i><<They already haStitch-1/17/1998
11260 Lawrence, no my argument is not they cannot go lower, my argument is that they Zeev Hed-1/17/1998
11259 Wiseowl, <<they won't be making money in 1998>> Latest estimateBrian Lempel-1/17/1998
11258 Exactly! Now here is something that I haven't seen mentioned, but is IMO, Brian Lempel-1/17/1998
11257 <<Specifically, the company expects to have converted substantially to MRBald Eagle-1/17/1998
11256 Zeev I agree the chart looks very flat at 10 for a bottom, but the situation asGreg Jung-1/16/1998
11255 >Alien, the very negative feelings on this thread are telling me to start anFrodo Baxter-1/16/1998
11254 Alien, the very negative feelings on this thread are telling me to start and loZeev Hed-1/16/1998
11253 >>I got a shareholder packet, too, although I thankfully do not own APM aAlienTech-1/16/1998
11252 <i>Nobody else really wants it yet, at least in volumes other then develoJonathan Bird-1/16/1998
11251 Jonathan, <i><<I don't expect anyone but IBM to actually ship GStitch-1/16/1998
11250 <i>Specifically, the company expects to have converted substantially to MJonathan Bird-1/16/1998
11249 Dave, I got a shareholder packet, too, although I thankfully do not own APM anyBrian Lempel-1/16/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News