100% + Gain, in 72 Hours or Less | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech
100% + Gain, in 72 Hours or Less

An SI Board Since December 1997

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans
1488	20	0

Emcee: Instock	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
113	Slim, Wish I did...I'd a picked up 10x as much!! :( But, Hunter and I have	Chartgod	-	12/5/1997
112	So you did! And its now up >40% today. I think this qualifies you. But I	Slim Pickens	-	12/5/1997
111	Check out EGGS, call-to-put ratio for Dec options is 21: Message 2888120	Alec Epting	-	12/5/1997
110	I posted on it last night...{or early this morn} I forget. Good fundementals..	Chartgod	-	12/5/1997
109	Nice move on AASI today James...but you needed to tell us yesterday. Do you ha	Slim Pickens	-	12/5/1997
108	You guys missed out on AASI...Still should fly well though. james	Chartgod	-	12/5/1997
107	I liked your AWLT idea and got in today at 3/8. My broker only takes bids in f	Slim Pickens	-	12/5/1997
106	BRLI looks interesting. See new site at Subject 18389	stockvalinvestor	-	12/5/1997
105	You missed the point. Those who caught a 100% up stock did predict a rise or ju	wmwmw	-	12/5/1997
104	Very Well, But you're still missing the point regarding 5% of SYQT. To pred	Schmedley	-	12/5/1997
103	Ray, re: "hope and a prayer" Sorry, only ruthless trading for big ga	Matthew Tyson	-	12/5/1997
102	1. 5% a 3.00 stock is not 1/8th. 2. Not 80% of all list stocks are $3.00 stocks	wmwmw	-	12/5/1997
101	In , I will refrain from my insider attempt at humor. Didnt mean to stir the p	David M.	-	12/5/1997
100	Looks might strong, TWA does. As for lost profits, I once owned Berkshire Hath	freelyhovering	-	12/5/1997
99	4profit, i am glad you did not think i was flaming your choice of stac. never	raymond marcotte	-	12/5/1997
98	David: Are you ok? I know we sometimes have to much, but I think you are going	Instock	-	12/5/1997
97	Off Topic! Instock, How does the TA look for (INVN) Invision Inc.? Don S.	Don Savage	-	12/5/1997
96	Come on now Wang,you can do better than that! - 5% of a 3.00 stock(SYQT)isn'	Schmedley	-	12/5/1997
95	Myron ,Ill put them into my watch list ,I have followed ames since 2.50 That wa	David M.	-	12/4/1997
94	David--It is funny isn't it. I have a bunch of little ones with improving	freelyhovering	-	12/4/1997
93	You Wild And Crazy Guys And Gals.You Too Feraldo.What An intro InSCott ROFL.Myr	David M.	-	12/4/1997
92	A new name appears on SI--Welcome Yves. I hope you will join into the play ofte	freelyhovering	-	12/4/1997
91	lalala	yves bellemare	-	12/4/1997
90	RLLY Update: The Nasdaq was down, BUT RLLY was UP! RLLY tested it's	Instock	-	12/4/1997
89	Re:egghead - EGGS - Someone just bought 2000 calls at Dec. 10 with the stock at	NeverRight	-	12/4/1997

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):