SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
Munch-a-Biotech Today
An SI Board Since December 1998
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
3158 136 0
Emcee:  Biomaven Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1133From The WSJ on-line: >>Investment bankers say the time also may be ripe keokalani'nui-9/25/2001
1132Joe, Could it also be that they are trying to leverage their 1.5 Billion in casjayhawk969-9/25/2001
1131Peter--Re the CTIC conference call, it's 1 hour long with the most interestiJOEBT1-9/25/2001
1130>> My 3 largest holdings are SEPR, IMGN, and CTIC << Up 20% today..scaram(o)uche-9/24/2001
1129Peter--My 3 largest holdings are SEPR, IMGN, and CTIC. CTIC is a recent additiJOEBT1-9/24/2001
1128Peter perhaps eln just wants to add a mature biotech to its collection they havdalroi-9/23/2001
1127John, I don't think that ELN could add much to SEPR that they (SEPR) canBiomaven-9/23/2001
1126>However I do see SEPR as pretty vulnerable to a munch here. Their market capJohn Metcalf-9/22/2001
1125SGP doesn't want another allergy drug - they've got Clarinex once the FDBiomaven-9/22/2001
1124I have hoped that a deal like IMCL/BMY would re-ignite the biotechs but the currSpekulatius-9/22/2001
1123I think the BMY/IMCL deal illustrates just how desperate big pharma is for stronBiomaven-9/20/2001
1122Morningstar's perspective on BMY/IMCL: We still think Bristol-Myers Squibb mopgcw-9/20/2001
1121Thanks. Sound good to me. [eom]Miljenko Zuanic-9/20/2001
1120Re: Manufacturing and other IMCL stated explicitly that it is responsible for keokalani'nui-9/20/2001
1119Thanks Wilder. Did they mention anything about manufacturing? IMCL was going alMiljenko Zuanic-9/19/2001
1118>>Bought September calls? When? After the news was out? Why would anyone hSnowShredder-9/19/2001
1117:-) (see my edits to my previous post, made as you were answering?)scaram(o)uche-9/19/2001
1116As Sam said: "We (the industry) learned long ago not to put any ceilings okeokalani'nui-9/19/2001
1115>> This is a really good deal. << Yup. A great deal. As rkrw saysscaram(o)uche-9/19/2001
1114IMCL/BMS. This is a really good deal. Best of all BMS stock holding up as wellkeokalani'nui-9/19/2001
1113>> tomorrow << pessimist! Geeeeeze, dark clouds everywhere. Boughscaram(o)uche-9/19/2001
1112We will see how much is munched when, if, IMCL discloses the royalty or profit skeokalani'nui-9/19/2001
1111Sure that it does. Even, it is more important. It is munch of the candidate. OncMiljenko Zuanic-9/19/2001
1110Do partial munches count if they're big enough? This just out . . . &tuck-9/19/2001
1109<<I doubt if anyone wants to buy into the MAXM mess either. The others allMiljenko Zuanic-9/4/2001
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News