SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
NUKO INFORMATION SYSTEMS
An SI Board Since May 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
3509 6 0 NUKO
Emcee:  BILL JAMES Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1134 I agree. Analysts don't start coverage with a hold recommendation. I alsopeter grossman-2/23/1997
1133 Don, I appreciate all your posts here. Your insight and information and optimipeter grossman-2/23/1997
1132 considering how wrong TJ was re his estimates for NUKO I must take anything hehcm1943-2/23/1997
1131 S.M. I really like your input here, I hope you are right. <"orders thiDon W Stone-2/23/1997
1130 I would have to disagree that Q1 will be bad, with the current backlog and theS.M.Anderson-2/23/1997
1129 Friends of the CEO .. maybe? --mehranmehran-2/22/1997
1128 peter, Excellent synopsis of existing NUKO predicament...I think in light of hJohn Sikora-2/22/1997
1127 Found this Form 144 filing as I was searching the wires. I don't know the Damon Pham-2/22/1997
1126 Burn rate does not refer to operating expenses which have both a fixed and varipeter grossman-2/22/1997
1125 What nobody asked and something that is very important (if Gorman ever returhcm1943-2/22/1997
1124 John; This next qtr results are not going to be good IMO. They haven't annoDon W Stone-2/22/1997
1123 On the otherhand, considering a 20Million burn rate in operating expenses, whatjohnd-2/21/1997
1122 This represents good thinking; Thanks. Now here are my own "FORWARD LOOKINDon W Stone-2/21/1997
1121 Actually there was no any transaction between about 12:30pm to 3:00pm. I was woJames Yu-2/20/1997
1120 Peter you keep right on posting as long a descertation as you like without apohcm1943-2/20/1997
1119 Can you post is full analysis thanksjohnd-2/20/1997
1118 TJ has 12.5M shares (fully diluted) in his modelJay Reynolds-2/20/1997
1117 Interesting little flurry of activity at the end of the day. Price was flat forAlan Aronoff-2/20/1997
1116 Are you sure revenues were reduced to 40million? That is a bit discomforting. Cjohnd-2/20/1997
1115 I am kind of hoping that these estimates are an overreaction to being burned bypeter grossman-2/20/1997
1114 NUKO was reiterated "BUY" by TJ Singh and Paul Rodriguez at UnterbergScott Stents-2/20/1997
1113 Thanks. I liked being post eleven eleven because eleven is my six month price tpeter grossman-2/20/1997
1112 Your post #1111 says it all and it says it very well. Now all we can do as inveLionel Freiberg-2/20/1997
1111 I own Nuko at 16 1/2, 11 1/2, 8 1/2, and a bunch at 6 1/2. In assessing Nuko&#peter grossman-2/20/1997
1110 Good evening all; News on First Call late this afternoon. I did not see it hcm1943-2/19/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News