ATC Communications ATCT | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks
ATC Communications ATCT

An SI Board Since June 1996

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans	Symbol
2636	4	0	ATCT

Emcee: SI (no user)	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Market Data Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
1136	I know exactly how you feel. I also participate in the death of stock. The da	Y. Maxine Miller	-	4/10/1997
1135	Henry --- IMHO ---you are so right !! > > Large ownership by mutual fund	Cheryl Galt	-	4/10/1997
1134	<<StockSmart is a great free reat site, continually adding new functions.	Eric Jorgenson	-	4/10/1997
1133	Large ownership by mutual fund in summer 1996 is the reason for current dismal	blast_investor	-	4/10/1997
1132	RHN and Dana, Regarding StockSmart's ownership data... StockSmart is a gr	Cheryl Galt	-	4/10/1997
1131	Well Edgar, I can certainly relate to your "finger of stock death".	Tony C.	-	4/10/1997
1130	Hi Henry, thanks for the input. It's nice to have an "outsiders"	Edgar Ethelridge	-	4/10/1997
1129	Francis, as well as others: What significance does everyone see in $5 per shar	brother	-	4/10/1997
1128	I am holding my position for now. If and when it breaks five, I think I'll	Francis Chang	-	4/10/1997
1127	Don't you mean there were many mutual funds "still" accumulating	Dana Merrill	-	4/10/1997
1126	To all: FYI on ATCT Check out the web site below regarding ATCT. It seems like	R.H.N	-	4/10/1997
1125	You may be right...Runnup in techs may improve margin levels for a lot of holde	Jim Rathmann	-	4/10/1997
1124	Jim, your statement regarding "real selling" cannot be generalised. I	Sunny Span	-	4/10/1997
1123	Be careful at this point. If it drops below $5, it becomes non marginable and	Jim Rathmann	-	4/9/1997
1122	bob, maybe smaller company smaller workforce & more pressure to do job.	Sunny Span	-	4/9/1997
1121	Henry, I don't disagree with you entirely, but given that I am down nearl	Timir	-	4/9/1997
1120	This stock looks more and more like a disastrious loser. I want to say to all	blast_investor	-	4/9/1997
1119	This may seem like the case, but smaller companies often have to comply with th	Rodger Wenzel	-	4/9/1997
1118	Bob: Since I don't work for the company, I can't answer your rather po	brother	-	4/9/1997
1117	I know of very few small cap stocks that do their books in an 8 day period...	Greg h2o	-	4/9/1997
1116	hang tight bob! Has anything changed in the fundamental reasons of why you ori	Greg h2o	-	4/9/1997
1115	If you can buy at $1 than 5 is a 400% gain. If you bought at $5 and sold at $1,	Nicholas P. Acquaviva Jr.	-	4/9/1997
1114	Gary, I agree that management will continue to improve on their communication w	Greg h2o	-	4/9/1997
1113	And it could go to 0....how do you figure if it goes to 1 it's a 500% loss?	Greg h2o	-	4/9/1997
1112	Kind of short-term oriented, aren't you? If that decline occurs in the nea	Greg h2o	-	4/9/1997

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):