SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Applix is back in action
An SI Board Since February 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
3014 28 0 APLX
Emcee:  Magnifique Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1139 <<Unfortunately, when a company reports a disappointing quarter, it is quMichael Burry-3/31/1997
1138 << all I need to do now is triple my position at say 3.00 after a pMichael Burry-3/31/1997
1137 Yes, Michael, a few come to mind like Shiva (which I got nailed on today) and MDoug Fowler-3/31/1997
1136 I hope -now there's a word- to get Cowen's words tomorrow-the printed oGary Burton-3/31/1997
1135 Robert, The analysts and the market are very often in disagreement. All one haMichael Burry-3/31/1997
1134 Thanks Mike for your calming words. I have no problem being a long term investoStephen M. DeMoss-3/31/1997
1133 Mike: why were the analysts so seemingly in the dark, if "the market"Robert K. Schott-3/31/1997
1132 Gary: I always admire your postings. You were on the Aldila thread, weren'tJolly Roger-3/31/1997
1131 Stephen, The bad news is yes, there is a loss. As I noted on my web page, NeedMichael Burry-3/31/1997
1130 Well, I'll take a stab at it opening at 4.25 and sinking to 3.63 intraday. Gary Burton-3/31/1997
1129 Roger: you are now our resident sage (not sarcasm, you just called it first asRobert K. Schott-3/31/1997
1128 Dear Mike, Let me see if I understand (forgive me if I'm in shock or somethStephen M. DeMoss-3/31/1997
1127 I have to agree that the recent 75% selloff since January was due to factors (aS. Bashakis-3/31/1997
1126 Robert: This was kind of what I expected. The guys at the company were just tooJolly Roger-3/31/1997
1125 It seems likely that the selloff was due to awareness by major investors of troScott Maxwell-3/31/1997
1124 I was in a hurry to respond to some e-mail. Sorry. 11 M in revenue is up $200Michael Burry-3/31/1997
1123 right here, Steve, losing money. I just saw the news. read the last paragraphRobert K. Schott-3/31/1997
1122 Reuters story indicates revenue/earnings shortfall due also to "several laS. Bashakis-3/31/1997
1121 What happened to the 'no worries'? Where do we go from here? When they Stephen M. DeMoss-3/31/1997
1120 There's the catastrophe. MikeMichael Burry-3/31/1997
1119 Applix announces estimated results for Q197 WESTBORO, Mass.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--jim A-3/31/1997
1118 To all: for those naysayers concerning the potential of Applix Enterprise; forRobert K. Schott-3/31/1997
1117 <<is it possible that the stock has tanked for reasons having absolutely Michael Burry-3/30/1997
1116 George: I am sorry if my language was not clear, but when I said that I intendRobert K. Schott-3/30/1997
1115 You buy,buy again, buy again,buy on margin,buy on margin again! Once again, I&#George Sepetjian-3/30/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News