SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes
Bad investing information/advice on the net contest
An SI Board Since July 1999
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
214 7 0
Emcee:  The Other Analyst Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
114 To be fair, there are probably more than a few professionals who would have to The Other Analyst-10/8/1999
113 This is utterly ridiculous. Unfortunately, I am going away for the weekend andEdwarda-10/8/1999
112 <i>OK, let's get back to the purpose of the thread--bad information oEdwarda-10/8/1999
111 Anyone found bad advice looking for a financial planner online? Or, heck, goodDimFlash-10/8/1999
110 Let's pick on the Washington Post. washingtonpost.com Earnings per share The Other Analyst-10/8/1999
109 What does Quicken say about a Prospectus? <i>Prospectus A document thatThe Other Analyst-10/8/1999
108 Let's see how Quicken did in its glossary <i>Beta coefficient A meaThe Other Analyst-10/8/1999
107 OK, let's get back to the purpose of the thread--bad information on the netThe Other Analyst-10/8/1999
106 I did not mean to suggest that it was bad advice, merely interesting and a poteEdwarda-10/7/1999
105 Yes, but I wouldn't call it bad investing advice.The Other Analyst-10/7/1999
104 Have you seen this site? earningswhispers.comEdwarda-10/6/1999
103 Although this is humorous, there is more truth here than ought to be possible. Edwarda-9/26/1999
102 This is more of a cautionary tale: deseretnews.comEdwarda-9/22/1999
101 Shameless post grubbing! And you are not only unofficial, you are self appointEdwarda-9/1/1999
100 As the unofficial judge of this contest, I thought I'd claim the 100th postchalu2-9/1/1999
99 Laughing heartily.... Let's go for it! Edwarda-8/31/1999
98 Be careful or I am liable to go after the AIMR. They are the sources of some bThe Other Analyst-8/31/1999
97 <i> Valuation was never a science, always an art-plus-science. </i>Edwarda-8/30/1999
96 Valuation was never a science, always an art-plus-science. The science part isThe Other Analyst-8/19/1999
95 On the other hand, I have seen some utterly bizarre rationales for valuing 'Edwarda-8/18/1999
94 Outdated P/E ratio? Lately I've been seeing a lot of references to the &quoThe Other Analyst-8/18/1999
93Message 10969196 Nyah, Nyah! Edwarda-8/16/1999
92 <i>>>And, of course, we know that the most rigoroous fundamental anEdwarda-8/16/1999
91 There's an even simpler objection--prices don't follow mathematical forchalu2-8/15/1999
90 Promises, promises <VBG> My humble contribution to the thread on valuingChuzzlewit-8/15/1999
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News