SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical
Caprius(CAPR), Breast MRI(former ANMR/MAMO)
An SI Board Since December 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
2615 6 0 CAPR
Emcee:  Warren Wannabe Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1140 Of course, you doctors are doing your best... but get the point once and for alluis a. garcia-4/30/1997
1139 This investment is testing the investor. That is why fundamentally you buy the luis a. garcia-4/30/1997
1138 Luis: There is no doubt we must deploy and build from that point... I'ld lWarren Wannabe-4/30/1997
1137 Luis-- Maybe we can get a Mamo machine a guest spot on ER or Chicago hope. MamBucky Katt-4/30/1997
1136 A parts per billion goal in medicine is lofty and while I applaud your ambitionJames L. Fleckenstein-4/30/1997
1135 Dc Fleckenstein I guess big philosophical difference between my perspective andluis a. garcia-4/30/1997
1134 Warren in the GEMS article you published regarding the MRI guided surgery statiluis a. garcia-4/29/1997
1133 Hey Ken! I'm very much aware that this is a prime objective of MAMO's..Warren Wannabe-4/29/1997
1132 But of course Ken the machine is had one beta trial after approval and essentialuis a. garcia-4/29/1997
1131 Warren, The people at MAMO believe they CAN distinguish between benign and maliKenneth Xavier-4/29/1997
1130 I think debate is healthy Dc Fleckenstein. You are wellcome to call me on anytluis a. garcia-4/29/1997
1129 Short answer to your question: Specificity is # cases correctly identified asJames L. Fleckenstein-4/29/1997
1128 DrF: In the case of MR, the term "low specificity" means...? I am asWarren Wannabe-4/29/1997
1127 Your comment about "xray interests being powerful", while possibly trJames L. Fleckenstein-4/29/1997
1126 Warren, be clear that this study did not attempt to replicate the Harms study. James L. Fleckenstein-4/29/1997
1125 Raymond: Welcome to the thread...! I appreciate the words of support. I'm Warren Wannabe-4/29/1997
1124 Warren my impressions are the same as yours.. I generally think of the first lluis a. garcia-4/29/1997
1123 DrF: Thanks for your post. A couple questions if you know... I'm disappoinWarren Wannabe-4/29/1997
1122 Raymond, We can't count on the GEMS contract any longer. At the Boston meetKenneth Xavier-4/29/1997
1121 The study used a 1.0T Siemens unit with dedicated breast coils, 4mm slice thickJames L. Fleckenstein-4/29/1997
1120 I am a loyal stockholder of ANMR/MAMO since they started their business many yeRaymond-4/29/1997
1119 Dr. F, I wondered if you'd be kind enough to elaborate on the visit you hadRob Wachowsky-4/29/1997
1118 JLF, This study is NOT good for the cause. You're absolutely correct in yoBradpalm1-4/28/1997
1117 The AJR article came out today. Do mammography, sonography and MR mammography James L. Fleckenstein-4/28/1997
1116 Luis: I've enclosed a link to a recent s.e.c. filing by ANMR... I havenWarren Wannabe-4/28/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News