SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Applied Magnetics Corp
An SI Board Since September 1995
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
12298 24 0 APM
Emcee:  Raymond Thomas Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
11423 Pierre, << What happened to Gus >> He's out looking for peopLarry Brew-2/20/1998
11422 Todd, You are quite right, APM is not working on the optical technology. I havStitch-2/19/1998
11421 Maybe he's off trying to help SEG get out of the dumps :) toddT Bowl-2/19/1998
11420 Todd, Pierre. What happened to Gus?? PXPierre-X-2/18/1998
11419 Since I think I got it from you, you must be right. Yup, I went back to 12/20,Dave Chanoux-2/18/1998
11418 <<Both Read-Rite and APM are known to be working with Seagate.>> NT Bowl-2/18/1998
11417 Hello Brian, In the Read-Rite Conference call in January, Mr. Yansouni (ChairmDave Chanoux-2/18/1998
11416 When I first saw the SEG release, I had the same opinion. However, to my underBrian Lempel-2/17/1998
11415 Since I didn't see any reason either; I expected the same, so I agree with Spots-2/17/1998
11414 With the Seagate announcement, I expected APM to go down - it went up for no reBob Walsh-2/17/1998
11413 Thread, any comments on today's action? I'm curious if there are insigSpots-2/17/1998
11412 Yeah, I'm out of APM and in CREAF, so today is a happier day. RegardsSpots-2/12/1998
11411 David, I saw the move on RDRT today, too. It was very interesting. After breaBrian Lempel-2/12/1998
11410 After further research, I swapped out of APM today and into RDRT at 15 3/16 I aDAVID BANISTER-2/12/1998
11409 In the ifs and buts were candy and nuts department it looks like it would have Helios-2/8/1998
11408 I hope that APM is not thinking of taking another run at RDRT! Wouldn't makRobert T. Quasius-2/8/1998
11407 Wiseowl, issuing more shares does not necessarily have to have a dilutive effecZeev Hed-2/8/1998
11406 During the meeting, Crisman was asked for his outlook for the future. In his rKen Kettler-2/8/1998
11405 IFC food for thought on the vagaries of tech stock investing with more than a fappro-2/8/1998
11404 Stitch: I guess I didn't include my full line of thinking... I was thinkiJens Riege-2/8/1998
11403 >>I think everybody missed my earlier point: until one share of the Spots-2/7/1998
11402 Robert, Not at all. We got your point, just no need to acknowledge the kickingStitch-2/7/1998
11401 Jens, While cost affects the bottom line it seldom really interferes with vendStitch-2/7/1998
11400 << until one share of the additional authorized APM stock is issued, therBald Eagle-2/7/1998
11399 I think everybody missed my earlier point: until one share of the additional auRobert T. Quasius-2/7/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News