SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends
Technical Analysis - Beginners
An SI Board Since September 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
12039 217 0
Emcee:  gonzongo Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
11464<i>Why does everyone have X as their last name here?</i> Hey, you&#Trader X-2/7/2001
11463bullish scenarios: I agree, there is alot of evidence now that the Naz could seTrader X-2/7/2001
11462<i>"Ya'll just one big happy family??"</i> Curiously TechTrader42-2/7/2001
11461Thanks...Andriy Turhovach-2/7/2001
11460Bo - not sure if I mentioned, but if you can pick up Kaufmanns "Trading SysMichael Watkins-2/7/2001
11459Hi Bo, You might want to post a message on Subject 36945 - Teresa Lo is a lonMichael Watkins-2/7/2001
11458Interesting day; I guess tomorrow we'll see what the market can put togetherMichael Watkins-2/7/2001
11457Unless it was the posts from two weeks ago that opened the clubhouse doors.TechTrader42-2/7/2001
11456Also, while I'm on a roll and being a pain in the neck with all these questiAndriy Turhovach-2/7/2001
11455OpusX -- (Why does everyone have X as their last name here? Ya'll just oneAndriy Turhovach-2/7/2001
11454Trader X - LOL. You'll notice I followed the phrase "enlightened bunAndriy Turhovach-2/7/2001
11453Hey, Brookie... did you read that? we're an "enlightened bunch". Trader X-2/7/2001
11452I would also be interested in comments on TSPro. Do you have the new product thaOpusX-2/7/2001
11451Michael and others -- Greetings. The more I use TradestationPro the more I likeAndriy Turhovach-2/7/2001
11450Micheal, more hammer-like? the intraday for QQQ appears to be very "hammerTrader X-2/7/2001
11449The candlesticks are interesting. The lower shadow in the Nasdaq's daily chaTechTrader42-2/7/2001
11448I just go with the flow. I'm sure some will attach reasons but how can it beDick Brown-2/7/2001
11447What do you make of this late recovery? EOMTrader X-2/7/2001
11446ORCL still hanging in there..But we have 30 minutes to be wrong..Relatively speaDick Brown-2/7/2001
11445Chris, a head/shoulders pattern. On WAVX chart, today is marking (perhaps) a riTrader X-2/7/2001
11444and with that last clunk on the SP, I'm out for two nice short trades. GottaMichael Watkins-2/7/2001
11443I'm seeing lots of sellers come across at key points on the futures. Not jusMichael Watkins-2/7/2001
11442Could it be....Nasdaq 2000? what are the possible scenarios now? A retest ofTrader X-2/7/2001
11441Oops! Even as I posted... Naz fell below 2600 rather decisively to about 2590.Trader X-2/7/2001
11440well the futures on a 45 minute chart remain in a downswing, so until that changMichael Watkins-2/7/2001
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):