SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy
Anyone following UTI Energy Corp.?
An SI Board Since December 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
1305 4 0 UTI
Emcee:  Frederick Menslage Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1155 I added UTI today in the low 6s after selling ABTX at 10 this morning. from 8 The Ox-10/9/1998
1154 I'm jealous! Didn't have the time to follow UTI today. I did pickup aThe Ox-10/8/1998
1153 just bought 5,000 shares of uti between 5 7/8 @ 6. michael j. brown-10/8/1998
1152 <i>I believe that the acquisitions are one of the reasons UTI continues tNazbuster-10/7/1998
1151 I believe that the acquisitions are one of the reasons UTI continues to be extrThe Ox-10/7/1998
1150 Hard to believe a firm with a $7 stock has been active in acquisitions this yeaNazbuster-10/7/1998
1149 Dan, Just multiply that by the number of trading days in a year, and soon you&R. Murphey-10/7/1998
1148 What's really disgusting is that 7/16 is 5.74%!Nazbuster-10/7/1998
1147 Couldn't take it anymore unloaded half at 7 3/16. This market wants to go Wowzer-10/7/1998
1146 DITTO RORY--you can be sure this baby will soar as soon as I jump ship.. Lost1-10/7/1998
1145 Off Topic - So MIND now has P. Blake Dupuis, a former CFO of UTI Energy CorporaNorm Tock-10/7/1998
1144 I think were getting real close to a bottom folks. Because I am just about reaWowzer-10/6/1998
1143 Their exposure to nat gas may be the reason for the relative strength in their RGinPG-10/5/1998
1142 I'm tired of waiting. It was a good idea at the time, but CNBC this morninNazbuster-9/30/1998
1141 In my opinion, companies like UTI that are 70-80% natural gas will have to diveHarold S.-9/30/1998
1140 The quetion is if the natural gas keeps up,will UTI outperform the sector if oiLTK007-9/30/1998
1139 Nat Gas currently trading at $2.50. Its been a long time since I have seen thaCaptain James T. Kirk-9/30/1998
1138 Thanks,Harold,and Peace:) Max(eom) LTK007-9/23/1998
1137 My apologies..I was totally incorrect. Thanks for pointing it out. I shouldnHarold S.-9/23/1998
1136 Well Daniel I didn't want to get Harold upset---but these figures seal it--LTK007-9/23/1998
1135 Here's the trades over 4k: <pre> 06:30 4,500 8 1/4 at open 07:06 7Nazbuster-9/23/1998
1134 Have to agree with Max on this one. The top 10 volume trades were as follows: Wowzer-9/23/1998
1133 Well Harold I can see we aren't going to get along--too bad---- here is todLTK007-9/23/1998
1132 NO, someone was selling UTI big at 1/2. The fact that it is near 9 now does noHarold S.-9/23/1998
1131 I think he was referring to MIND. LOL (private joke) Captain James T. Kirk-9/23/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News