SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks
Applied Magnetics Corp
An SI Board Since September 1995
Posts SubjectMarks Bans Symbol
12298 24 0 APM
Emcee:  Raymond Thomas Type:  Unmoderated
Introduction Market Data Compact
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
11573 Dear William - while it is possible that APM, or any co for that matter, may veBosco-3/24/1998
11572 T Boul; were are you ? <G> action speaks better than words, are you educaJames F. Hopkins-3/24/1998
11571 How could there *not* be more bad news? If QNTM misses by over 20 cents and thWilliam T. Katz-3/24/1998
11570 When people report what was said on CNBC or whatever, sometimes the facts are iLK2-3/24/1998
11569 I agree that this doesn't look like an usual DCB. APM and other DD stocks mBosco-3/24/1998
11568 It's a dead cat bounce all right. Looks like a lot of short covering on hiFrodo Baxter-3/24/1998
11567 If this is dead cat bounce, there are dead cats bouncing all over the street - Spots-3/24/1998
11566 Todays action demonstrates that you have to be long this stock before a move upMark Adams-3/24/1998
11565 I think that the move in APM today may be in response to statements made by theDumar Grey-3/24/1998
11564 This may be what is commonly called "a dead cat bounce." One of my c777 Captain-3/24/1998
11563 >>Buy Buy Buy!<< Todd, you are so cute. You have my vote for APMLK2-3/24/1998
11562 TBowl, I hope your right. Does TBowl mean what I think it does? Its where I'Kashmir-3/24/1998
11561 Buy Buy Buy! This is obviously a huge panic to cover... Over 600k shares bougT Bowl-3/24/1998
11560 Are we seeing a cover/buy on the fact with APM today? Pretty decent volume andDennis Nicks-3/24/1998
11559 all - looking at QNTM performance right now, there is some sign that the DD secBosco-3/24/1998
11558 you mentioned CC provided some insights into RDRT's production problems. IBill Lin-3/24/1998
11557 i agree that the technological costs are increasing at faster than linear rate,Bill Lin-3/24/1998
11556 AT, I like everyone else hate losses. Besides my shares are held in an IRA. I hKashmir-3/24/1998
11555 <<At the risk of repeating myself>> Please do. Repost same next moT Bowl-3/24/1998
11554 Hey Stitch: Penny for your thoughts (that's all I have left - invested the777 Captain-3/24/1998
11553 Kashmir: I don't have any problems with Craig Crisman, I just think that h777 Captain-3/24/1998
11552 Kashmir, To be honest with you and FWIW its partially my job to watch the DDseStitch-3/23/1998
11551 How much lower. On 1/13/98 APM hit 9 7/8 intraday - closed at 10 7/8. On 3/18/777 Captain-3/23/1998
11550 Heck how much lower can APM go? I would just hold onto the shares and take the AlienTech-3/23/1998
11549 Lawrence, Darn, was I dissembling again? If I'm not careful folks'll tStitch-3/23/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News