SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends
The Dead Cat Bounce Theory
An SI Board Since March 1997
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
1836 12 0
Emcee:  stockvalinvestor Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1161 I caught UDCI on the first little bounce @16 Hoping to sell at 17 and catch theIquit 10-13-87-5/27/1997
1160 Rod: I don't follow what stock you are talking about... 8 3/8 etc. I'Steady_on-5/27/1997
1159 I think I ought to enlarge upon what I said about picking the DCB bottom. I saCrabbe-5/27/1997
1158 Good Afternoon all, I hope everyone had a good vacation. I put in an order forRobert Bless-5/27/1997
1157 Rod: I'm bidding at 15 5/8. It's made the upturn. Lets hope it bounceSteady_on-5/27/1997
1156 I like it. It's down 35% at the moment, it is the best type of news for a Crabbe-5/27/1997
1155 What do you think of UDCI this morning ??? Down 8+ to 16 on poor earnings. MarJason Loren Bauer-5/27/1997
1154 No! I do not agree. HOMS is as fundimentally sound as say FMAC was a month agoCrabbe-5/27/1997
1153 I don't care one way or the other really, fundimentals are good things to lCrabbe-5/27/1997
1152 Rod: I am one of those who selects fundamentaly sound companies as a screen foSteady_on-5/27/1997
1151 I know of nothing about Dead Cats that requires that the stock be financially sCrabbe-5/26/1997
1150 Re: HOMS Someone rightly called me down for discussing HOMS on this thread, asJim H-5/26/1997
1149 I would guess that the $3-$6/share is the amount of money available for reserveCrabbe-5/26/1997
1148 Gene, thanks for link. Great article to get a bigger picture on NASDAQ. Many deSenad Mulabegovic-5/25/1997
1147 i bought at 10 again at 8 and again at 5.5 now it stands at 7.5 Do you suggesdalroi-5/25/1997
1146 HOMS is probably worth a roll of the dice. I picked up some at 3/8 also, but aBraddock Bull-5/25/1997
1145 Kevin, I thought the theory behind DCB was to buy a fundamentally sound companyBuytick-5/25/1997
1144 Jim H: How do you get the idea that dilution sounds better than receivership Kevin Wang-5/25/1997
1143 HOMS - Appears from the news releases that they are seeking new capital throuJim H-5/24/1997
1142 HOMS, what is the future ? HOMS stay at 1/4 yesterday. What is the future for Kevin Wang-5/24/1997
1141 To all DCB's - NASDAQ - how MM's can and do manipulate trades; an insiGene Klein-5/24/1997
1140 Here Is An Idea to Start With.... | Most Actives | Gainers | Losers | Etc. OrTT-5/24/1997
1139 That was unkind. You are angry with me, no?Da Cat in Da Hat-5/23/1997
1138 I checked out Paul's site last night after I had posted to you. It's gRocketman-5/23/1997
1137 Some of the quotes I got weren't affected, but several were. I even tried Hollywood-5/23/1997
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):