SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech
Palweb Corp (PAEB)
An SI Board Since April 1996
Posts SubjectMarks Bans
2512 8 0
Emcee:  Steven M. McCaffrey Type:  Unmoderated
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):
ReplyMessage PreviewFromRecsPosted
1162 Mr C will get a share of the Union Group for every eligible share of Cabec he oChas-10/27/1998
1161 Apparently someone is still selling into strength. Wouldn't be afraid to gHarry Carr-10/27/1998
1160 The other thing to note is that if or when CBNR becomes a reporting company thiilh1-10/27/1998
1159 Delays or not, does anyone else find it rather amazing, not to mention perplexiMZUBOZ-10/27/1998
1158 <i>This looked interesting until I saw production won't take place unilh1-10/27/1998
1157 I came up with these Share numbers given info available to date 10/27/98: CBNRilh1-10/27/1998
1156 Thanks for the clarification. 18.5M in the float. Excellent. John John Wetterau-10/27/1998
1155 there are as of 10.19.98 18,562,256 stocks in the float. the rest of the stockmichael john-10/27/1998
1154 M. John, thanks for clearing up the stock positions. There are, then, approximaJohn Wetterau-10/27/1998
1153 I think that we all realize that if CBNR were a reporting company, trading on tMZUBOZ-10/27/1998
1152 Michael: Its no fun to speculate when you keep interrupting with facts! :) Thjmt-10/27/1998
1151 to all before the confusion gets to big Cabec has 100% of the Union Group Stockmichael john-10/27/1998
1150 New investors can now just be refered to post # 1147 . Thanks Dallas-10/27/1998
1149 John: Thanks for the history. It sounds as though if RC brought in MJ, then hejmt-10/27/1998
1148 Very well put. Chas-10/27/1998
1147 jmt, good question. For four years we've been trying to answer it. The origJohn Wetterau-10/27/1998
1146 MZ: Still not clear on the deal. The surviving entity including PPP will be Cajmt-10/27/1998
1145 It's already on the business wires. But it still takes awhile for people tDallas-10/27/1998
1144 Dallas, Would you like to speculate on where you feel the price should berjbac-10/27/1998
1143 Dallas, I AGREE!!! Do we know when this hits the business wires? rjbac-10/27/1998
1142 Second that motion of finally giving Curton the boot. Let him run Union Group Harry Carr-10/27/1998
1141 This is my understanding: The companies that form the Union Group were originaMZUBOZ-10/27/1998
1140 Could someone explain in general terms the arrangement with Union Group? What Harry_Behemoth-10/27/1998
1139 <i>This looked interesting until I saw production won't take place uMZUBOZ-10/27/1998
1138 This looked interesting until I saw production won't take place until AprilDavidCG-10/27/1998
Previous 25 | Next 25 | View Recent | Post Message
Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):