WAND (Milestone Scientific) | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical
WAND (Milestone Scientific)

An SI Board Since September 1997

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans	Symbol
717	9	0	MS

Emcee: Benny Freeman	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Market Data Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
117	Only estimate of margin I've heard is 60% gross, 30% net, for both capital	Mason Barge	-	10/8/1997
116	That's it Mason! That's the news I've been waiting for. It's re	Andrew G.	-	10/8/1997
115	YOWZA! For those who might not have gotten this, another piece falls into plac	Mason Barge	-	10/8/1997
114	PS Iceberg, I didn't mean to imply that you were accusing him of fraud. Bu	Mason Barge	-	10/6/1997
113	Mason, Called Investor Relations today and they were very friendly and answered	Ron Kline	-	10/6/1997
112	Oh, I thought you were concerned that this guy had overstated the Wand's po	Mason Barge	-	10/6/1997
111	Yes, I'm sure it's not necessary to comply with Rule 144 if you"re	Robert L. Jacobs	-	10/6/1997
110	>This guy wouldn't risk such an eminent career with outright fraud. Mas	Iceberg	-	10/6/1997
109	You think you're skeptical of Malamed's testimonial now? Wait until yo	Mason Barge	-	10/6/1997
108	>>These guys won't have to give advance notice for thier sales under	Mason Barge	-	10/6/1997
107	Mason, I don't agree with everything you said. This company has more than	AT7	-	10/6/1997
106	Mason, You're absolutely knew in these 13D filings over the past several we	Robert L. Jacobs	-	10/6/1997
105	Take a look at VOXL. Another interesting medical technology. steve	Steve Smith	-	10/6/1997
104	Impossible to do. I put in my order on Datek when the 16 # came up, but didn&#	Benny Freeman	-	10/5/1997
103	I agree that it's not so much what price you buy but whether the stock does	Ron Kline	-	10/5/1997
102	Ron: I have had a lot of developmental stocks in my life, and my approach is t	Mason Barge	-	10/5/1997
101	I'm glad you took the use of the word paranoid in the humorous way it was i	Mason Barge	-	10/5/1997
100	Ice, I looked at that article and I don't share your skeptism on the utiliz	Ron Kline	-	10/5/1997
99	>Lynn (and Ice), you guys are so paranoid! Mason, I'm not sure tha	Iceberg	-	10/5/1997
98	Mason, Thanks for the information. What you said makes a lot of sense. The only	Ron Kline	-	10/5/1997
97	>>I suggest people take a serious look at the latest (October 3, 1997) E	Mason Barge	-	10/5/1997
96	I just realized this hasn't been posted on the SI Board -- quote from a Dow	Mason Barge	-	10/4/1997
95	I am not a shareholder either, Ron. Before I invest in _anything_ I try to find	Lynn	-	10/4/1997
94	What I read in that Edgar filing is that someone knew that buying WAND at price	Ron Kline	-	10/4/1997
93	>....Someone is trying to make big money on this stock and taking it away f	Lynn	-	10/4/1997

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):