Legal proceedings via SI | Stock Discussion Forums

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes
Legal proceedings via SI

An SI Board Since December 1998

Posts	SubjectMarks	Bans
242	15	0

Emcee: Josef Svejk	Type: Unmoderated

Introduction Compact

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):

Reply	Message Preview	From	Recs	Posted
117	RE: <g> at end of post Sorry, all out of <g>'s on that subject	nihil	-	12/14/1998
116	uh, nihil? You forgot to put the <g> at the end of that post.	Ilaine	-	12/14/1998
115	In addition, the IP addresses are often "trunked" coming through AOL,	Bill Ulrich	-	12/14/1998
114	Hi Janice, thanks for post. As I posted a little while earlier, I started read	Ilaine	-	12/14/1998
113	<i>Does SI continue to allow these persons to have membership privileges?	Janice Shell	-	12/14/1998
112	Has anyone suggested that SI might also be held liable for any false and defama	M. Charles Swope	-	12/14/1998
111	I used to have a link to something like Women's Web, there was at least one	Ilaine	-	12/14/1998
110	My thought is that posters to SI should not be held to a very high standard of	Ilaine	-	12/14/1998
109	Well, yes, but I think it doesn't matter if they were booted. In the past,	Bill Ulrich	-	12/14/1998
108	>>>>>A lot of damage can be done in two weeks<<<<<	Ilaine	-	12/14/1998
107	>>>>what about all the bad things people are saying about your Pres	Ilaine	-	12/14/1998
106	>>>>>Their "posting style" and other identities are fa	Ilaine	-	12/14/1998
105	Wow... what gave that away? The graphics? Or the moniker, "Web Quack Psyc	Jeff Harrington	-	12/14/1998
104	All of those are relevant questions. I was trying to simplify one issue for a n	Estimated Prophet	-	12/14/1998
103	Dear Cheeky, IMO, an individuals previous posts establish a level of credibilit	De Peepster	-	12/14/1998
102	That must be why Ratso was still crazy after I sent him there. Sorry. z.......	zonkie	-	12/14/1998
101	RE: Can't Clinton sue his defamers? Of course. Damned near anyone can sue	nihil	-	12/14/1998
100	RE: (Canadian Police)... strip searching people (including rectally) for such t	nihil	-	12/14/1998
99	RE: silly suits If you really want to read some silly cases, see findlaw.com	nihil	-	12/14/1998
98	RE: false, pay damages There's more to it than that. Is Legacy "a pub	nihil	-	12/14/1998
97	RE: suing McDonalds over hot coffee Not so silly to sue. She collected.	nihil	-	12/14/1998
96	You want to really punish someone. Take away their posting rights. Talk to an	Cheeky Kid	-	12/14/1998
95	Just think, all of these types of situations could be easily settled with doubl	MSB	-	12/14/1998
94	John, I'm not a lawyer either. <grin> Your rephrased question: <	EL KABONG!!!	-	12/14/1998
93	Sorry Kerry- 2-302- bear in mind I am still a student and this is pertaining on	John WES	-	12/14/1998

Go to reply# or date (mm/dd/yy):